(1.) This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for passing a decision taken by the authority dated 08.08.2014, in pursuance to the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2806 of 2013, by which, the claim pertaining to disbursement of the amount in lieu of the work performed by the petitioner has been denied.
(2.) It is the case of the petitioner that in pursuance to the notice inviting tender, two works have been assigned pertaining to two different agreements i.e., agreement no.24 f2 and agreement no.27 f2 of 2010-2011.
(3.) According to the petitioner, even though, the work in entirety has not been completed but the respondents are admitting the fact that the substantial part of the work has been completed, therefore, for the said part of the work which has been completed, the petitioner is legally entitled to get the amount.