CHAMARI VISWAKARMA Vs. JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD both sides.

(2.) THE contention of the petitioner is that the electricity supply of the petitioner was disconnected without any show cause and another contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner runs a repairing shop therefore, in his premises several equipments were found lying for repairs and the inspection team presumed that those equipments are being used in the premises of the petitioner and, therefore, misconstrued in enhancing the power load.

(3.) IN this circumstance the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, both the authorities are not interested in submitting the report. The learned counsel for the petitioner relying on certain decision of this Court passed by as Division Bench and also by the Single Bench has argued that the disconnection without issuing show cause notice is violative of principles of natural justice therefore, a direction be given to the respondents to restore the electricity connection of the petitioner forthwith because the petitioner is suffering from the year 2000.