HARI RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In the present writ petitions, the interim orders were passed by this Court while relying upon the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that the controversy involved in the present writ petitions is identical to that of SBCWP No.9627/2020 wherein the Jaipur Bench of this Court has passed interim order, while issuing notices.

(2.) Today, Mr. Jangid, learned counsel appearing for the respondents at the outset submitted that the controversy involved in the said writ petition (SBCWP NO.9672/2020) has already been decided by the coordinate Bench at Jaipur vide order dated 29.9.2020 passed in SBCWP No.11723/2020 (Mukesh Kanwar and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) holding thus:-

(3.) Since the basic issue involved in the present writ petitions is akin to the issue involved in SBCWP No.11823/2020, which has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 29.9.2020 and appeal (DBSAW No.687/2020) whereagainst has been dismissed as withdrawn, this Court is not inclined to keep the present petitions pending and posts remaining unfilled.