SUKHVEER KAUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Reportable 1. This intra court appeal is directed against order dated 3.3.20 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellants challenging the revised result declared by the respondent-Rajasthan Staff Selection Board ('the Selection Board') for appointment to the post of Supervisor (Women) (Aanganwadi Workers Quota), has been dismissed. Applications (IA No.1/20 & 2/20)

(2.) The applicants Rajwant Kaur and others and Sudesh Kanwar and Another have preferred two applications (IA No.1/20 and IA No.2/20) for impleading them as party respondents in the appeal.

(3.) The facts relevant are that the appellants herein applied for appointment to the post of Supervisor (Women) (Aanganwadi Workers Quota) pursuant to advertisement dated 1.10.18 issued by the respondent-Board under the Rajasthan Women and Child Development Service Rules, 1998 (for short "the Rules of 1998"). As per proviso to Rule 23 of the Rules of 1998, the posts of Supervisor are filled in by direct recruitment through written examination conducted by Appointed Authority or Selection Board, as the case may be, in accordance with the Scheme and Syllabus specified in Schedule III. The scheme of examination as set out in Clause II of Schedule III of the Rules of 1998, reads as under: