SH. J. LALDUHZUALA & 3 ORS. Vs. STATE OF MIZORAM AND ORS.
HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Sh. J. Lalduhzuala And 3 Ors.
STATE OF MIZORAM And ORS.
Click here to view full judgement.
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA,J. -
(1.)Heard Mr. Lalfakawma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. Mary L. Khiangte, learned counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
(2.)As per the affidavit of Dasti Service filed by the petitioner, notice has been served upon all the private respondents except for respondent No. 5, who has refused to accept notice.
(3.)The respondent Nos. 10 and 11 (who were the complainants), have appeared in person today and they have prayed for time to engage a counsel. However, in view of the fact that the issue herein is limited only to the question whether notice was issued to the petitioners as per Section 25(1) of the Lushai Hills District (Village Councils) Act, 1953, and whether the Section 10(7)(a) of the Mizoram (Establishment of Independent Local Body) Ombudsman Rule, 2013 was violated, the prayer of the respondent Nos. 10 and 11 is not granted.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.