LAWS(GAU)-1966-2-2

EASTERN TEA ESTATE PRIVATE LTD. Vs. MUNICIPAL BOARD OF SILCHAR AND ANR.

Decided On February 15, 1966
Eastern Tea Estate Private Ltd. Appellant
V/S
Municipal Board Of Silchar And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision under Section 115 Code of Civil Procedure by the Plaintiff -Petitioner against the appellate order of the Subordinate Judge, Silchar refusing an interim injunction to the Plaintiff. Necessary facts are that the Municipal Board, Silchar issued a notice to the Petitioner under Section 158 of the Assam Municipal Act, 1950 - Assam Act XV of 1957 (hereinafter called 'the Act') asking him to remove certain encroachments on the allegation that they have been made by the Petitioner on the municipal land. The Petitioner applied to the Sub -divisional Magistrate for appointment of a surveyor and to measure the land as his contention was that there was no encroachment on the municipal land. On the direction of the Additional Deputy Commissioner the survey proceedings and the demarcation of the land were started.

(2.) THE Munsiff held that on the perusal of the original record of the encroachment case he did not find anything done by the Defendants in contravention of any provisions of law laid down by the Assam Municipal Act which can create a very, special circumstance to justify interference by him by way of injunction. Further he remarked that it is a well settled rule that it is not the practice of Courts to interfere with corporate bodies unless they are manifestly abusing their powers. The Munsiff thus rejected the prayer for interim injunction on the ground that there was no justification for an interference by him in the circumstances of the case as proceedings were pending before the Magistrate under Section 159 of the Act and further that unless there is an abuse of power by the Board, the public body's action should not be interfered with.

(3.) THE contention of the Petitioner is that if the point of law raised relates to jurisdiction then the Court cannot by wrongly deciding that point assume jurisdiction and thus this Court can under Section 115, Code of Civil Procedure examine the correctness of a point which relates to jurisdiction.