(1.) THE unsuccessful appellant craves a certificate under Article 133, sub-article (1) of the Constitution for appeal to the Supreme Court.
(2.) THE appellant's is a suit, alleging breaches of contracts, one of which is written and the rest are parol, and claiming recovery of Rs. 4,25,343.00. A.N. Ray, J., stays the suit and all proceedings thereunder, because of the written contract's arbitration clause which bears:
(3.) NO doubt, the iudgment is a judgment of affirmance. But I am satisfied that the appeal does involve substantial questions of law. That apart, the whole of materials, we have had put before us, completely satisfy me too "that the case is a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court", within the meaning of Clause (c), sub-article (1) of Article 133 of the Constitution. I proceed to state why I am satisfied so.