(1.) In view of the good grounds shown, the delay in preferring the appeal is condoned.
(2.) The appeal is directed against an order dated July 27, 2015 passed on a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondent is a tenant under the railways; or, at any rate, a lessee. The respondent entered into possession of the railway premises pursuant to an agreement of May 24, 1999.
(3.) There is no dispute that clause 4 of the relevant agreement empowers the railways to enhance the rent without notice to the petitioner. The railways enhanced such rent and claimed a sum in excess of Rs.1.21 crore from the respondent. By the order impugned, it was observed, inter alia, as follows:-