LAWS(CAL)-2011-7-120

DEL BAHAR PURKAIT Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Decided On July 19, 2011
DEL BAHAR PURKAIT Appellant
V/S
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A judgement has been delivered by Special Bench comprising of Three Judges of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in W.P. No. 331 of 2009 on 14th July, 2011 by passing the following order:-

(2.) Despite such legal position about effect of said judgement as quoted above, this writ application could be considered for our adjudication, which has been filed assailing the order passed by West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal applying the de facto and de jure doctrine. The principle has been illustrated by the Apex Court in several cases by holding, inter alia, that even if the appointment of a Judge or a Presiding Officer or any Adjudicatory Forum stand cancelled or set aside, the decision or judgement pronounced shall not be illegal on that score, but merit of the said judgement could be decided by Court. The Three Judges Bench of the Apex Court in the case Gokaraju Rangarajan vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1981 3 SCC 132 held to this effect "a Judge, de facto, is one who is not mere intruder or usufruct but one who held office under colour of lawful authority, even though his appointment is defective and may later be found to be so. Whatever be the defect of his title to the office, judgements pronounced by him and acts done by him when he was clothed with the power and function of the office, albeit unlawfully, have the same efficacy as judgement pronounced and acts done by a Judge de jure. Such is a de facto doctrine born of necessity and public policy to prevent needless confusion and needless mischief."

(3.) The Apex Court in the said case considered the views of different High Courts as well as the English Court, namely, the case Pulin Behari vs. King Emperor; Emedisetti Ram Krishnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1967 AIR(AP) 193; P.S. Menon vs. State of Kerala, 1970 AIR(Ker) 165; Milward vs. Thatcher; Sadding vs. Lorant; Re: James (an insolvent), reported in 1977(1) A.E.R. 364 (C.A.); State of Connectient vs. Carroll; Re: Albridge and Notion vs. Sheby County.