BANKU BEHARI JHAL Vs. MALOY KR BANERJEE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Court has heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties.

(2.) The facts of the case, briefly, are as follows:

(3.) The plaintiffs have alleged that on 21.11.1995 the plaintiffs came to learn from the office of the B.L & L.R.O that the said entire suit plot No. 252 has been recorded in the name of the defendant No.2 in the R.S. records-of-rights and on such basis the present one man one khatian recording has also been done in the name of the defendant No.2. The plaintiffs have alleged that their uncle Motilal Jhal was entrusted to have the suit property recorded in the record-of-right in favour of the plaintiffs but in the absence of the plaintiffs the recording in the revenue records were made erroneously in the name of the defendant No.2. The plaintiffs have alleged that the defendant No.3 has already turned down the prayer for correction of the recordof-right and hence the plaintiffs had to file the said suit. The plaintiffs have stated that the cause of action of the suit arose on 20.11.1995 and 21.11.1995.