CHANDRA PAL Vs. KESHAV DEO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAVI S. Diawon, J. Misunderstanding another man's religion can lead to disastrous results. Religious are not meant to be played around with for personal gain. Such is case in the present writ petition before this Court.

(2.) THE petitioner, Chandrapal, is a Hindu. His father-in-law instituted a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura that the petitioner be prosecuted under Sections 494 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code.

(3.) THE petitioner has also made some insidious expressions in the writ petition, which are otherwise vexatious, whatever they may be worth. THE submissions are in paragraph 13 of the writ petition to the effect that after a lapse of 41 years the Muslims have increased their population and they have enjoined more privileges. This Court cannot permit such expressions of irresponsibility to remain on record. Even otherwise they have no bearing or relevance with the case and are being deleted from the record.