DR. TARIQ ALI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This revision under Sections 397/401 of Cr.P.C, 1973, has been filed against the impugned order dated 05.03.2016 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bijnor, whereby application under Section 125 of Crimial P.C. of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 was allowed. The relevant facts in brief are as follows:-

(2.) It is submitted by the learned counsel for revisionist that opposite party no. 2 - Dr. Iram Fatima herself is a doctor and she can very well maintain herself as such the maintenance given to her is legally not sustainable. Learned counsel for the revisionist has also opposed the maintenance from the date of application but, so far the maintenance that is being awarded to the opposite party no. 3 - Baby Sadiya (Km. Sadiya Fatima), no objection has been raised by the learned counsel.

(3.) It is admitted fact that opposite party no. 2 married to revisionist though it is submitted by learned counsel that she has already been divorced by the revisionist but on that count the impugned order is not being challenged. This is not disputed that opposite party no. 2 is a doctor. She earns about Rs. 25,000.00 per month from the practices in her home town is disputed and she has also worked in Welcome Hospital Center from 04.08.2008 to 18.05.2009 is not disputed, but it is asserted by opposite party no. 2 that after that Dr. Iram Fatima is jobless and she is not practising and as such she is entitled to maintenance for herself.