(1.) G. S. N. Tripati, j. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Con stitution praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders Annexures 2 and 3 passed by respondents No. 1 and 2 respectively.
(2.) THERE is an pedigree given in the judgment of the learned Dy. Direc tor of Consolidation at page ft, which is as under; Kalika Sheetal Gopali Chhedi Shanker Ram Autar Natthu R. 4 Sukhdeo Behari Ramdeo Sheo Ratan Manmohan _____________________ Petitioner Ram Kripal Rameshwar Mst. Gujratia. Ram Vishal Tribhuwan R. 3. with a further addition that Tribhuwan is the daughter's son of Smt. Gujratia, Man Mohan is the petitioner. He represents the line of Chhedi. Natthu, respondent No. 4 is representing the line of Kalika and Tribhuwan, respondent No, 3 is representing the line of Shankar. After a battle for more than 2 decades, this point stands settled that Tribhuwan is the daughter's son of Smt. Gujratia and represents and interest of Gujratia, which she inherited from her husoand Ram Kripal.
(3.) THE learned Settlement Officer Consolidation and learned Dy. Director of Consolidation have accepted that majority of the plots came down from the day of Gopali, the common ancestor of the parties. However, their shape and continuity partially broke down some time in the year 1320 Fasli. THErefore, they came to a conclusion that the entries in the basic year were correct. THE claims of the parties were upheld in accordance with the entries in the basic year.