(1.) BINOD Kumar Roy, J. The petitioner prays to quash different orders passed by different consolidation authorities as contained in Annexure 3, 5 and 9.
(2.) THE main question which gave rise to the controversy between the parties was as to whether 60 decimals of land in plot No. 933 and 2. 45 acres of land bearing plot No. 1117 appertaining to Khata No. 430 of village Chakki pargana and district Jalaun were joint family properties of Gangadin as alleged by respondent Nos. 4 to 6 or self-acquisition of his son Gauri Shanker, whose son is the writ petitioner?
(3.) SHRI P. K. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5, on the other hand, contended as follows :- (i) The question urged are concluded by findings of fact and as such this writ petition should be dismissed with cost, (ii) The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner have got no force inasmuch as a finding was recorded by the authorities that the lands in question was acquired out of the joint family funds and by Gangadin. MY FINDINGS :