MOHD. IRFAN ANSARI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been invoked by the petitioner for seeking the following reliefs:-

(2.) The petitioner's case, before this court is that he appeared in U.P. State Public Services Examination of 1994 batch, and was selected for the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police. A notification of appointment dated 26.3.1998 was issued, wherein the name of the petitioner finds mention at serial no.15. This notification of appointment was not a part of the record of the writ petition and has been made available by the counsel for the petitioner, during the course of hearing, which is taken on record. The order dated 26.3.1998, provides for posting of the candidates for the purposes of training at Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Police Academy, Moradabad, and their appointment was to be on probation, for two years, from the date they assumed charge. It also provided that respective seniority of the candidates were to be determined in accordance with the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Police Service Regulations, 1942.

(3.) The petitioner submits that he had received communication dated 4.4.1998, which required the petitioner to report for joining on 20.5.1998 at the Police Academy, Moradabad, for training. It is further submitted that as delay was likely to be caused in holding of the training, he decided to appear in All India Civil Services Examination and, therefore, applied for extension of time for six months, to join vide application dated 5.5.1998. Another application was moved, reiterating the same contents on 14.5.1998. Lastly, he applied vide application dated 24.7.1998. However, no orders extending the time for joining were passed and consequently the period for joining was not extended beyond 20.5.1998. Ultimately, the petitioner was served with an order dated 1.9.1998, cancelling his appointment on account of not joining at Police Academy, Moradabad.