MOHD. ANEESH KHAN Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Manas Bhargav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) IT is the case of the petitioner that in pursuance of the advertisement for the post of Constable in P.A.C., the petitioner applied and after qualifying various tests, he was sent for training at Sitapur IInd Battalion P.A.C. and thereafter he has been appointed. However, by the order dated 19.3.1999, the petitioner's service has been terminated by the Commandant, IInd Battalion, Sitapur on the ground that services of the petitioner are no more required further. No other reason has been given. Against the said order, the petitioner filed appeal, which has also been dismissed by the Deputy Inspector General 1, P.A.C., Bareilly Region, Bareilly vide order dated 16.7.1999. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The writ petition has been entertained and an interim order has been passed staying the operation of the order dated 19.3.1999. However, it is not clear that whether the petitioner has joined or not. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been filed.

(3.) IN support of the contention he relied upon various decisions: