JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Apprehending arrest in a non-bailable offence, a cine artist cum producer has approached this Court seeking pre-arrest bail
under sec. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for
short the Cr.P.C). Petitioner alleges that the ingredients of the
offences are not made out and hence his liberty ought not to be
curtailed, unless and until he is found guilty in accordance with
the procedure established by law.
(2.) On 22/4/2022, on the basis of information received from an actress alleging several instances of rape committed on
her by the petitioner, Crime No.515 of 2022 of Ernakulam Town
South Police Station was registered. A statement was also given
by the victim under Sec. 164 Cr.P.C on 23/4/2022. The
petitioner is alleged to have committed rape on the victim with
the promise of marriage, twice during her menstrual periods and
on other occasions, after causing physical injuries and without
her consent. The prosecution further alleges that, on coming to
know about the registration of the crime, petitioner went abroad
in an attempt to flee from the hands of law and sitting in the
comfort of another country, instituted this bail application under
sec. 438 of Cr.P.C.
(3.) Petitioner, on the other hand, denies the allegation of rape as wholly false and pleaded that the accusation is only a
machination of the victim who was upset on getting information
that another actress was decided to be cast as a heroine, by the
Director of that movie, in a new movie project proposed to be
produced by the petitioner. The survivor even expressed her ire
at the new heroine in front of many people, on 18/4/2022. It
was also pleaded that evidence of the nature of relationship
between the petitioner and the survivor is available in plenty, on
the mobile phones through WhatsApp messages and Instagram
chats and other documents. It is alleged that, by quirky conduct,
a consensual relationship is projected as rape.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.