ARUN KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
UNION OF INDIA
Click here to view full judgement.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J. -
(1.)The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation
and Resettlemendt Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 2013 Act')
which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the
effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition
Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1894 Act') in respect of which
Award No.12/1996-97 dated 18.12.1996 was made, inter alia, in respect
of the petitioner's land comprised in Khasra Nos. 13/21/1 (0-04), 13/22/1
(1-06) and 13/28 (0-04) measuring 1 bighas 14 biswas in all in village
Budhpur shall be deemed to have lapsed.
(2.)Though the respondents claimed that possession of the said land was taken on 20.01.1995, the petitioner disputes this and maintains that
physical possession has not been taken. However, insofar as the issue of
compensation is concerned, it is an admitted position that it has not been
(3.)Without going into the controversy of physical possession, this much is clear that the Award was made more than five years prior to the
commencement of the 2013 Act and the compensation has also not been
paid. The necessary ingredients for the application of Section 24(2) of
the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in the
following cases stand satisfied:-
(1) Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors: (2014) 3 SCC 183;
(2) Union of India and Ors v. Shiv Raj and Ors: (2014) 6 SCC 564;
(3) Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors: Civil Appeal No. 8700/2013 decided on 10.09.2014;
(4) Surender Singh v. Union of India and Others: WP(C) 2294/2014 decided on 12.09.2014 by this Court; and
(5) Girish Chhabra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors: WP(C) 2759/2014 decided on 12.09.2014 by this Court.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.