JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs instituted a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction against
deceased defendant-Bhagaiya Bai, in which Bhagaiya Bai
made counter-claim against the plaintiffs. Suit filed by
respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs was dismissed and
counter-claim filed by defendant-Bhagaiya Bai was allowed
by the judgment dated 4.4.2012.
(2.)Feeling aggrieved against the order dated 4.4.2012, respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs preferred an appeal
before the First Appellate Court. During pendency of the
appeal, Bhagaiya Bai died on 4.2.2014, for which
intimation was given by petitioner-Laxmin Bai and
ultimately the petitioner filed an application under Order
1 Rule 10 of the CPC for impleading her on the basis of Will executed by Bhagaiya Bai and ultimately that application
was withdrawn. Thereafter, the petitioner filed applications
under Order 22 Rule 4 and Order 22 Rule 9 of the CPC.
Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has also
been filed. The First Appellate Court inquired the
application through the trial Court and on 07.11.2014 the
trial Court held that Laxmin Bai is legal heir of deceased
Bhagaiya Bai. Thereafter, the First Appellate Court by its
order dated 1.8.2015 rejected the applications under
Order 22 Rule 9 of the CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation
Act and consequently, dismissed the application under
Order 22 Rule 4 of the CPC for substitution. Against which,
this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India has been filed by the petitioner.
(3.)Mr.Prafull Bharat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that petitioner has already filed
applications under Order 22 Rule 9 of the CPC and Section
5 of the Limitation Act, therefore, the First Appellate Court could not have been rejected the applications holding that
the application filed by the petitioner was beyond the
period of limitation i.e. after three months and also
rejected the application for substitution stating inter-alia
that the order passed by the trial Court is perverse and
contrary to the record.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.