(1.) THE respondent No.2/the Divisional Control ler, KSRTC, Bel lary Division, in MVC No.23/2005, on the f ile of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), MACT, Gangavati, preferred this appeal against the judgment and award passed in the said case on several grounds.
(2.) THE respondent is represented Sri.Chandrashekar P. Pati l. The appellant has chal lenged the judgment and award passed by the trial court on two grounds, namely:
(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the appel lant as well as the respondent.