SONIA Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD
LAWS(SC)-2007-8-74
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on
August 07,2007
SONIA
Appellant
VERSUS
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Respondents
Referred Judgements :-
P MAHENDRAN MALTEESH Y ANNIGERI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]N T DEVIN KATTI VS. KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
Cited Judgements :-
CITIZEN SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY VS. UOI [LAWS(DLH)-2012-9-258] [REFERRED TO]TOPCEM INDIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2024-6-2] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH TRIPATHI VS. REGISTRAR GENRAL [LAWS(MPH)-2010-4-79] [REFERRED TO]
N SATHYA VS. CHAIRMAN TEACHERS RECRUITMENT BOARD [LAWS(MAD)-2009-12-201] [REFERRED TO]
Anjuman Taraqqi-e-Urdu Jharkhand VS. State of Jharkhand [LAWS(JHAR)-2011-11-48] [REFERRED TO]
ANUPAMA D/O KUMAR SATHE VS. CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE AND COLLECTOR [LAWS(BOM)-2008-8-422] [REFERRED]
AKSHAYA KUMAR SWAIN VS. STATE OF ODISHA [LAWS(ORI)-2017-1-96] [REFERRED TO]
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTARANCHAL VS. JAGDISH CHANDRA SINGH BORA [LAWS(SC)-2014-3-10] [REFERRED TO]
VISHWANATH DIGAMBAR WADJE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2022-3-149] [REFERRED TO]
AJIT SINGH PATEL AND 10 OTHERS; SHIVAM KUMAR NAYAK AND 13 OTHERS; PRAVEEN KUMAR GAUTAM; ANAND MISHRA AND 8 OTHERS; MOHAMMAD SHAMS; SYED AHMAD ALI; KAILASH VISHWAKARMA; SAMRAH AHMAD; RAJESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS; ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-11-172] [REFERRED TO]
T.S. DAS AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2016-10-78] [REFERRED TO]
PARENTERAL DRUGS INDIA LIMITED VS. STATE OF H.P. [LAWS(HPH)-2007-8-73] [REFERRED TO]
BRAJENDRA TRIPURA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS [LAWS(GAU)-2012-7-111] [REFERRED TO]
J SUKUMAR VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2012-7-629] [REFERRED]
NITIN PANDEY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-12-107] [REFERRED TO]
SAUMIL HETALKUMAR SHAH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2022-10-621] [REFERRED TO]
KONJENGBAM IBOMCHA SINGH VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(GAU)-2009-1-27] [REFERRED TO]
TIKENDRAJIT SINGHA VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2008-12-11] [REFERRED TO]
REETA SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-2-211] [REFERRED TO]
SUCHITRA PANDA VS. DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2015-3-34] [REFERRED TO]
CHITARANJAN KUMAR SINHA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2016-5-45] [REFERRED TO]
V. VINCENT VELANKANNI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2024-9-78] [REFERRED TO]
ARBIND KUMAR VS. JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-5-10] [REFERRED TO]
VIKAS BALWANT ALASE VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2022-7-209] [REFERRED TO]
MEENAKSHI JAIN VS. DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-4-68] [REFERRED TO]
NILESH SHUKLA VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2009-10-60] [REFERRED TO]
D JAYALALITHA VS. DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION [LAWS(MAD)-2009-12-193] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR BAKSHI VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2021-7-70] [REFERRED TO]
JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 23rd August, 2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby the High Court dismissed a writ application filed by the appellant only on the ground that no legal right of the appellant had been infringed.
(3.)A writ petition was filed by the appellant for a direction upon the respondent to consider the case of the appellant for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Administrative Officer (AAO) against the vacancy reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates. A further direction was also prayed by the appellant to the extent that the respondents should keep one vacancy reserved for the appellant who had competed and was found successful as a candidate from Scheduled Caste reserved category and for other incidental reliefs.
(2.)This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 23rd August, 2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby the High Court dismissed a writ application filed by the appellant only on the ground that no legal right of the appellant had been infringed.
(3.)A writ petition was filed by the appellant for a direction upon the respondent to consider the case of the appellant for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Administrative Officer (AAO) against the vacancy reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates. A further direction was also prayed by the appellant to the extent that the respondents should keep one vacancy reserved for the appellant who had competed and was found successful as a candidate from Scheduled Caste reserved category and for other incidental reliefs.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.