(1.) A certain Basavaraj was the driver of a privately owned car. In the night of October 28, 1992 he took out the car for a joyride and along with five persons, who were his neighbours, proceeded for the nearby Anjaneya temple for offering pooja. On way to the temple the car met with a fatal accident in which Basavaraj and four other occupants of the car died; the fifth passenger sustained injuries but escaped death. One of the persons dying in that motor accident was Nagaraj, whose parents are the appellants before this Court.
(2.) The heirs and legal representatives of the deceased driver, Basavaraj filed a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. They got nothing. The Commissioner under the Workmens Compensation Act found and held that the accident did not take place in course of employment and rejected the claim for compensation.
(3.) The heirs of the four occupants of the car, dying in the accident (including the present appellants) and the fifth passenger suffering injuries in the accident sought compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. Their claims proved to be equally barren.