- (1.)HEARD the parties.
(2.)AS agreed, the case is being disposed of at the stage of admission.
The petitioner was recommended by the Committee and appointed as Anganbari Sevika vide Memo No. 173, dated 17th June, 1999. Her services having been terminated vide Letter No. 191, dated 30th October, 2001, has challenged the order of termination.

(3.)ACCORDING to petitioner, the Chief Development Project Officer has issued the impugned order without application of mind and without the recommendation of the Selection Committee, who selected the petitioner. The recommendation of the selection Committee is essential as the authority alleged the selection of petitioner was illegal.