JUDGEMENT
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, J. -
(1.)Smt. Mukesh Devi and Ghanshyam alias
Mahaveer, appellants herein, along with
Krishna Kumar, Dayala Ram and Smt.
Suman Devi were placed on trial before
learned Additional Sessions Judge Khetri,
who vide judgment dated September 30,
2005 convicted and sentenced the appellants as under :-
JUDGEMENT_1840_CRLJ_2007Html1.htm
(2.)The brief facts as unravelled by the
prosecution at the trial are as follows :-
On May 22, 2005 the informant Surendra
Singh (P.W. 5) submitted a written report
(Ex. P-3) at police station Buhana, stating
therein that on the said day while his father
and brother were going from the well after
unloading bricks. Ghanshyam, Krishna
Kumar. Smt. Mukesh and five others came
in a jeep armed with lathi. Barchhi and axe
and wayled his father Reghuveer and brothers Krishna and Banwari and
started beating them. On raising hue and cry Suresh
and Hari Ram intervened and took them to
hospital. On that report a case under Sections 147, 148, 149. 341, 323 and 307, IPC
was registered and investigation commenced. In the course of investigation
injured Raghuveer died and Section 302, IPC
was added. Post mortem on the dead body
was performed, necessary memos were
drawn, statement of witnesses were recorded, the accused were arrested and
charge sheet was filed. In due course the
case came up for trial before the learned
Additional Sessions Judge Khetri. Charges
under .Sections 148, 341 323, 324, 302 alternatively 302/149, IPC were framed. The
accused denied the charges and claimed
trial. In support of its case the prosecution
examined as many as 11 witnesses. In the
explanation under section 313, Cr. P. C., the
accused claimed innocence. No witness in
defence was however examined. Learned
trial Judge on hearing final submissions
convicted and sentenced the appellants as
Indicated herein above. Co-accused Krishna
Kumar. Dayala Ram and Smt. Suman Devi
were however acquitted. Complainant
Surendra Singh assailed the finding of acquittal in revision petition No. 1038/2005.
Whereas appellant Mahaveer has challenged
the acquittal of the members of complainant party in the cross case instituted by the
accused party in revision petition No. 1237/
2005. We proceed to decide all the three
matters together.
(3.)Learned counsel for the parties during their respective submissions took us to
the material on record, a look of which demonstrates that prior to the death the injuries
sustained by Raghuveer (deceased) were
examined vide injury report (Ex. P. 7), which
reads thus ;-
1]. Swelling with bruise 2 x 2" on left
temporal region.
2]. Abrasion with bruise with swelling 2
x 2" on upper 3rd and lateral side of left leg.
3]. Weakness on Rt. and upper lower limb
of Rt. half of body on hemiporesis
Autopsy on the dead body of Reghuveer
was performed by Medical Board and postmortem report (Ex. P-6) was drawn. As per
Dr. Vidyadhar (P.W. 6), who was one of the
member of Medical Board, the cause of death
was coma due to head injury.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.