AJAY SINGH Vs. RAJASTHAN CIVIL SERVICES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE all these writ petitions are directed against the order dated 25.10.99 as common question is involved, all the abovesaid four writ petitions are decided by this common order.

(2.) BEFORE proceeding in this case it is pertinent to mention here that how these cases came to be listed before me. For this I would like to cite the proceedings taken in the case of Ajay Singh vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal & Others (1)

(3.) SMT. Pramila Surana, respondent No.3 challenged the order dated 23.2.1996 by way filing an appeal before the respondent No.1 wherein she claimed that the order dated 23.2.96 be declared null and void so far it relates to the appellant whereby her year of allotment of selection grade against merit cum seniority quota has been lowered down from 1991-92 to 1992-93. On 17.9.1996, respondent No.1 called for the record of the respondent No.3 and after examining the APARs and other relevant record he gave a categorical finding that the respondent No.3 was not meritorious enough for promotion against the vacancy of 1991-92.