JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)SINCE common issues for determination arise in these appeals, all these cases are for connivance (sic) sake, taken up for consideration and
disposal by this common judgment.
(2.)THESE appeals are directed against the judgment of 3rd Additional District Judge, Srinagar in file nos: - 10/numberi, 13/Numbri,
22/Numbri, 16/Numbri, of 1998 dated 3 1.8.2006, 22/Numbri of 1999.
(3.)THE brief facts and the earlier history of the case is that respondent -Bank (J&K Bank Ltd.) notified various posts of
cashier -cum -clerk/typist -cum -clerk in the pay -scale of Rs. 1750 -4775 vide
advertisement notice no. Per/Rectt/97 -1580 dated 2.6.1997. The appellants
in CIA Nos: 67,68 & 69 of 2006 and 58 of 2007 alongwith other eligible
candidates applied but they have not been selected. Feeling aggrieved of
their non -selection they alongwith some other unsuccessful candidates who
have now withdrawn from these cases, filed separate suits before the
trial Court which were heard and disposed of by the Additional District
Judge, Srinagar by a common judgment dated 16.7.2003. The Court dismissed
the suits of the petitioners as it found that the selection made was in
accordance with the rules. Against the said judgment the appellants filed
four separate appeals bearing CIA Nos. 85/2003, 86/2003, 106/2003 and
113/2003 before this Court which were heard and disposed of by a common judgment by this Court dated 23.12.2004. This court remanded the case to
the trial court with certain observations. The matter has now been
considered by the trial court (3rd Additional District Judge, Srinagar)
and by means of the judgments impugned he has again dismissed the suit of
the appellants in CIA Nos: 67,68,69 of 2006 and 58 of 2007, while as he
has allowed the suit in respect of (Plaintiffs) Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi and
Gulshan Mohd. Mugloo.
It is against the dismissal of the suits that CIA Nos: 67, 68 & 69 of 2006 and 58 of 2007 have been filed.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.