JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)This revision petition is directed against the
judgment dated 4.7.2006 of the learned Appellate Authority
(Fast Track Court), Shimla passed in Rent Appeal No.6-S/14 of
2005/04.
(2.)Material facts necessary for the adjudication of this
petition are that the respondent/landlord (hereinafter referred to
as "the landlord" for convenience sake) has instituted a petition
seeking eviction of the petitioner/tenant (hereinafter referred to
as "the tenant" for brevity sake) from the demised premises on
the ground that she, without the written consent of the landlord,
has committed such acts as were likely to impair materially the
value or utility of the building/premises. The tenant has
undertaken construction work relating to extension of shop for
installing an iron shutter and putting wooden partition inside the
shop with a purpose to convert the rear portion in to a
residential one. She has covered the floor with stones and tiles
which were quite heavy and considering the old condition of the
building were most unsuitable as extra weight has been added.
According to the landlord, the building could collapse as it has
developed cracks.
(3.)The petition was contested by the tenant. The
tenant has denied that any addition or alteration has been made
which could impair materially the value or utility of the premises.
According to her, she has carried out necessary repairs in the
shape of fixing glasses in the windows, changing the broken
ceiling and did white wash and change of furniture.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.