SANJAY LAKHE PATIL Vs. HARIBHAU BAGADE
LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-102
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Decided on December 04,2014

Sanjay Lakhe Patil Appellant
VERSUS
Haribhau Bagade Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

LANCASTER MOTOR CO. (LONDON) LTD. V. BREMITH LTD. [REFERRED TO]
COUNCIL OF CIVIL SERVICE UNIONS V. MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICES [REFERRED TO]
JANARDHAN REDDY VS. STATE OF HYDERABAD [REFERRED TO]
STATE OFBIHAR VS. KAMESHWAR SINGH:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH:GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:KAMESHWAR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
M S M SHARMA VS. KRISHNA SINHA [REFERRED TO]
MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS VS. STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
HIS HOLINESS KESAVANANDA BHARATI SRIPADAGALVARU SHRI RAGHUNATH RAO GANPAT RAO N H NAWAB MOHAMMAD IFTIKHAR ALI KHAN SHETHIA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIMITED THE ORIENTAL GOAL GO LIMITED VS. STATE OF KERALA:UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SYNTHETICS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
KIHOTO HOLLOHAN VS. ZACHILLHU [REFERRED TO]
S R BOMMAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
S R BOMMAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. G GANAYUTHAM [REFERRED TO]
JAGDAMBIKA PAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ARNIT DAS VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
A ONE GRANITES VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS I VS. INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WELFARE [REFERRED TO]
BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY VS. PALITANA SUGAR MILL PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. AKHIL GUJARAT PRAVASI [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. R L VAID [REFERRED TO]
CEMENT CORPN OF INDIA VS. PURYA [REFERRED TO]
KALYAN CHANDRA SARKAR VS. RAJESH RANJAN [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT FORGE CO LTD VS. UTTAM MANOHAR NAKATE [REFERRED TO]
ZEE TELEFILMS LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR JHA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
RAJA RAM PAL VS. SPEAKER LOK SABHA [REFERRED TO]
RAMDAS ATHAWALE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
AMARINDER SINGH VS. SPECIAL COMMITTEE PUNJAB VIDHAN SABHA [REFERRED TO]
A M PAULRAJ VS. SPEAKER T N LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY [REFERRED TO]
NARSINGRAO GURUNATH PATIL VS. ARUN GUJARATHI SPEAKER [REFERRED TO]
MANJIT SINGH VS. MAHARASHTRA ASSEMBLY [REFERRED TO]
SATISH CHANDRA VS. SPEAKER, LOK SABHA [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Lakhe Patil & Anr in PIL (L) No.131 of 2014, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the PIL(L) No.131 of 2014. PIL(L) No.131 of 2014 is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
(2.)The other remaining Petitions viz Writ Petition (L) No.3070 of 2014 and PIL (L) No.128 of 2014 can be disposed of by a common judgment since the relief claimed by the Petitioners in both these Petitions is more or less identical.
(3.)The Petitioner in Writ Petition (L) No.3070 of 2014 was elected as MLA from Chandivli Constituency in recent Assembly Elections which were held on 15th October, 2014. He was a Cabinet Minister for Textile and Minority Development in previous Government. He claims to be filing this Petition on behalf of the Congress Legislature Party. He has stated that out of total 288 seats, the results, as announced by the Hon'ble Election Commission, were as follows:-
BJP - 123 seats-[One MLA has expired after election results]

Shiv Sena - 63 seats

Congress - 42 seats

NCP - 41 seats

MNS - 1 seat

Others - 20 seats

-------------------------------------

TOTAL = 288 Seats

-------------------------------------



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.