JUDGEMENT
G.A.SANAP,J. -
(1.)In this appeal filed at the behest of the accused/appellant Mohd. Kutubuddin Kamruddin Ansari challenge is to the judgment
and order dtd. 30/7/2018 in Special Child Criminal Case
No.67 of 2016 passed by learned Special Judge under Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Nagpur, whereby the
learned Judge convicted the appellant for the offences punishable
under sec. 302, 363 and Sec. 201 of the Indian Penal Code
(for short 'I.P.C') and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life
for commission of murder of Kumari Akbari Khatun and to pay fine
of Rs.25,000.00 and in default to pay fine, to suffer rigorous
imprisonment for one year and sentenced him to suffer
imprisonment for life for murder of Noorain and to pay fine of
Rs.25,000.00, and in default to pay fine of Rs.25,000.00 to suffer
rigorous imprisonment for one year. For the offence under sec. 363, the learned Judge sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000.00 and in default to pay fine,
to suffer imprisonment for three months. For the offence under
sec. 201, the learned Judge sentenced him to suffer imprisonment
for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000.00 and in default to pay
fine, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. Learned Judge
directed that the life imprisonment awarded for murder of Akbari
Khatun and life imprisonment awarded for murder of Noorain to
run consecutively. The sentence under Sec. 363 and 202 of the
I.P.C have been ordered to run concurrently with sentences under
sec. 302 of the I.P.C.
(2.)The facts leading to this appeal are as follows:- P.W.3-informant -Mohd. Iliyas Ansari resides at Nari Road,
Kamgar Nagar, Nagpur with his wife and children. Deceased Akbari
Khatun aged 13 years was his daughter and deceased Noorain aged
10 years was his son. P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas at the time of the incident was running a Tyre Shop at Uppalwadi. The appellant is brother-inlaw of the brother of P.W.3- Mohd. Iliyas by name Mohd. Shakil.
They have acquaintance for last 20 years. Initially, the appellant was
running a shop at Pardi Naka and thereafter he shifted his shop at
Automotive Square, Teka Naka, Nagpur. He was dealing in the
business of Tyre. P.W. 3 - Mohd. Iliyas would purchase old Tyre
from the appellant. P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas owed Rs.50,000.00 to the
appellant out of business transactions. There was dispute about the
actual quantum. According to the appellant, the outstanding amount
was Rs.1,50,000.00. The appellant repeatedly demanded the amount
of Rs.1,50,000.00 from P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas. P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas
requested him for time to pay the outstanding amount.
(3.)The appellant stopped his business at Nagpur and started working at his brother's Tyre remoulding shop at Seoni Madhya
Pradesh. Fifteen days before the incident, the appellant made a
phone call from his mobile number 9589319248 on the mobile of
P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas being No.9421542536 and made the demand
of the outstanding amount. P.W.3 - Mohd. Iliyas assured him to pay
the amount between 5th and 10th dates of the next month. According
to the prosecution, this was the motive for the appellant to commit
the crime.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.