RAVINDRA BABU SHRIWAS AND ORS ; GAURAV TIWARI AND ORS ; ASHUTOSH SHARMA; HARPAL SINGH; KULVEER SINGH & 9 ORS ; RAVINDRA ANAND; UPENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND 2 OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U P THRU SECY & ORS
LAWS(ALL)-2017-12-103
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 06,2017

RAVINDRA BABU SHRIWAS AND ORS ; GAURAV TIWARI AND ORS ; ASHUTOSH SHARMA; HARPAL SINGH; KULVEER SINGH And 9 ORS ; RAVINDRA ANAND; UPENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND 2 OTHERS Appellant
VERSUS
State Of U P Thru Secy And Ors Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

RANANJAYA SINGH VS. BAIJNATH SINGH [REFERRED TO]
NEWSPAPERS LIMITED VS. STATE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL U P [REFERRED TO]
KANAI LAL SUR VS. PARAMNIDHI SADHUKHAN [REFERRED TO]
J K COTTON SPINNING AND WEAVING VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. VIJAY ANAND MAHARAJ [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLAINTIFF THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF MADHYA PRADESH THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ASSAM THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ORISSA THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR T VS. UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFE [REFERRED TO]
GHANSHYAMDAS VS. REGIONAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX NAGPUR [REFERRED TO]
PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. LABOUR COURT MADRAS:CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT [REFERRED TO]
NYADAR SINGH M J NINAMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
U P BHOODAN YAGNA SAMITI U P VS. BRAJ KISHORE [REFERRED TO]
TINSUKHIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED VS. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
APHALI PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
R S RAGHUNATH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. SAVEEN KUMAR SHETTY [REFERRED TO]
NASIRUDDIN VS. SITA RAM AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT VS. GUJARAT KISHAN MAZDOOR PANCHAYAT [REFERRED TO]
BALRAM KUMAWAT VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SWEDISH MATCH AB VS. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD INDIA [REFERRED TO]
NATHI DEVI VS. RADHA DEVI GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH KUMAR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
OFFSHORE HOLDINGS PVT LTD VS. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. - (1.)Heard Sri Radha Kant Ojha, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Sri Subhash Singh Yadav, Sri Navin Kumar Sharma, Sri Vibhu Rai and Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners in the connected writ petitions, Shri Mohan Ji Srivastava, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents, Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Allahabad, respondent no.3, and Sri Gulrej Khan holding brief of Sri J.H. Khan, learned counsel for the selected candidate-respondent no.3. No one appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 4,5,6, and 7 even in the revised call.
(2.)Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent no.3 in the leading writ petition has been filed by the selected candidates. The State has also filed counter affidavit.
(3.)Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No.113669 of 2013 has been filed by the applicant, who is a selected candidate and is permitted to be impleaded as respondent no.3 in representative capacity and for the same reason another Impleadment Application No.191239 of 2013 filed by the selected candidates/applicants for being impleaded as respondents in the writ petition, is also allowed. The applicants are directed to be impleaded as respondent Nos. 4,5,6 and 7 in the array of parties.
Necessary corrections be incorporated during the course of the day.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.