PANKAJ KUMAR Vs. K.L. KATYAL
LAWS(DLH)-2013-9-23
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decided on September 03,2013

PANKAJ KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
K.L. Katyal Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

VELUYUDHAN SATHYADAS VS. GOVINDAN DAKSHYANI [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Dr. Pankaj Kumar has filed this suit against Shri K.S. Katyal for a decree of specific performance of the agreement to sell and purchase dated 19th February 2005 thereby directing the Defendant to perform his part of the contract and execute title deeds in respect of the suit property i.e. Flat No. C- 1/A/98A, Pankha Road, Janakpuri, New Delhi (hereafter 'the suit property') in favour of the Plaintiff and in the alternative to direct the Defendant to pay the amount equivalent to the difference between the sale price and the market price of the suit property prevalent at the time of filing of the suit to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has also sought a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from selling, transferring, alienating, creating any third party interest and/or parting with possession of the suit property in favour of any third person other than the Plaintiff.
(2.)The case of the Plaintiff as narrated in the plaint is that an agreement dated 19th February 2005 was entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant whereby the Defendant agreed to sell the suit property for a total sale consideration of Rs.20,25,000. On the same date, Plaintiff paid Rs.1 lakh to the Defendant as earnest money in cash. The said payment was duly acknowledged by the Defendant by putting his signatures on the revenue stamp in the agreement executed by the Defendant.
(3.)The Plaintiff states that the Defendant also represented to the Plaintiff that he is the exclusive owner of the suit property and the same is free from mortgage and encumbrances. The Defendant undertook to execute the sale deed in favour of the Plaintiff on or before 30th June 2005 in the office of the Sub Registrar, Delhi. It was agreed that the balance sale consideration of Rs.19,25,000 would be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant in the Sub Registrar's Office and vacant possession of the suit property would be handed over by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on the spot. In the second week of March 2005, the Defendant approached the Plaintiff asking him to complete the deal by March 2005 itself. The Plaintiff states that he immediately applied for a loan from HDFC Bank on 20th March 2005 for a sum of Rs. 16 lakhs. The loan was sanctioned on 25th March 2005 and a final disbursement advice was issued by HDFC Bank to the Plaintiff on 30th March 2005. The Plaintiff also paid interest of Rs.596 for the month of March 2005. The Plaintiff states that the balance sale consideration was ready with the Plaintiff by the end of March 2005. The Plaintiff states that he also purchased stamp papers worth Rs.1,40,000 on 29th March 2005 for the purposes of execution of the sale deed. He stated that although the agreed last date for execution of the sale deed was 30th June 2005, the Plaintiff was ready with balance sale consideration of Rs.19,25,000 by the end of March 2005 itself.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.