ESSCO FABS PVT LTD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(SC)-2008-11-90
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on November 07,2008

ESSCO FABS PVT. LTD.,PANIPAT TEACHERS (RECOGNISED SCHOOLS)HOUSING CO-OPEATIVE SOCIETY LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF CHENNAI VS. C K RAMACHANDRAN [LAWS(MAD)-2009-9-158] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH CHAND VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-5-48] [REFERRED TO]
KALI CHARAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(SC)-2024-11-70] [REFERRED TO]
WOMEN EDUCATION TRUST VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(SC)-2013-5-82] [REFERRED TO]
DEV SHARAN VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(SC)-2011-3-28] [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(SC)-2011-4-6] [REFERRED TO]
LAKHBIR SINGH AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2011-3-692] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK AGGARWAL AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2010-12-149] [REFERRED TO]
DHARAMBIR SINGH THROUGH L RS , SMT ONKARI THROUGH L RS AND ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS [LAWS(P&H)-2010-4-310] [REFERRED]
BIJWASAN GRAM VIKAS SAMITI VS. L G DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2010-10-18] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL AZIZ VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-12-28] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-8-33] [REFERRED TO]
DAYA RAM TYAGI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-38] [REFERRED TO]
INDRAPAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-8-340] [REFERRED]
UPBHOKTA SANRAKSHAN EVAM AWAS VIKAS SAMITI VS. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-112] [REFERRED]
MADAN MALJI KAMBLI VS. STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY [LAWS(BOM)-2012-5-39] [REFERRED TO]
R. PALANISAMY VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU [LAWS(MAD)-2013-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
GAITY ARA ROZY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2011-7-326] [REFERRED]
B M PURNACHANDRAN VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SPECIAL INITIATIVES PLANNING [LAWS(MAD)-2011-1-550] [REFERRED TO]
KODANAD ESTATE VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2011-4-100] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SEWAK SAMAJ VS. LT.GOVERNOR [LAWS(SC)-2012-9-129] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. HIRAWATI DEVI & OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-132] [REFERRED]
KRISHNA BAHADUR SINGH VS. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KANPUR NAGAR [LAWS(ALL)-2015-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
SARITA GOEL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-8-67] [REFERRED TO]
ROTARY CO OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2010-11-158] [REFERRED TO]
NIRANJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2010-6-26] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR DASS AND ORS. VS. STATE AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2017-12-21] [REFERRED TO]
AAKASH EDUCATION SOCIETY CHITHERA VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-108] [REFERRED]
NARENDRA ROAD LINES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-7-60] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJ PAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-5-164] [REFERRED TO]
SEHDEV VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2010-2-187] [REFERRED TO]
MILAGRES CIPRIANO FERNANDES VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2024-2-162] [REFERRED TO]
PALANISWAMY AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF A P REVENUE (L [LAWS(APH)-2018-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KUMAR GHOSH & ORS. VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2009-6-73] [REFERRED TO]
DINESH CHAND GOYAL VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-142] [REFERRED TO]
RAJINDER VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2010-5-266] [REFERRED TO]
BHERU LAL VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-5-63] [REFERRED TO]
SHAHIDA HASAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2012-9-71] [REFERRED TO]
NAND KISHORE GUPTA VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(SC)-2010-9-82] [REFERRED TO]
BABUBHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2014-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
JAGTAR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2010-6-11] [REFERRED TO]
SATVINDER DEV VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2009-3-158] [REFERRED TO]
ADIL SINGH VS. UOI [LAWS(DLH)-2010-8-69] [REFERRED TO]
HATAM SINGH AND OTHERS; DEEPA GARG; NEMI NATH FOUN VS. STATE OF U P AND ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2016-9-338] [REFERRED]
KASHI JEEVDAYA VISTARINI GOSHALA EVAM PASHUSHALA VS. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-1-344] [REFERRED TO]
MADAN LAL AHUJA VS. U P STATE AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-5-243] [REFERRED]
BANSI LAL BHAT VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2012-8-18] [REFERRED TO]
G. MOHAMED HUSSAIN MALIM VS. GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY [LAWS(MAD)-2023-9-148] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH RAM VS. STATE [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-12-11] [REFERRED TO]
BHOPU VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2010-1-23] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA BARUAH VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2014-2-19] [REFERRED TO]
SWATI ENTERPRISES VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-6-51] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI SITA RAM JAISWAL AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-232] [REFERRED]
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. VS. RAJIV BERRY & ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2016-8-17] [REFERRED TO]
PADMARAJ VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2010-12-5] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Both these appeals are filed by the appellants being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated April 02, 2004, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Civil Writ Petition Nos. 1853 of 2003 and 2077 of 2002.
(3.)To appreciate the controversy raised in the present appeals, relevant facts in nutshell may be noted.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.