GMG ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES Vs. ISSA GREEN POWER SOLUTION
LAWS(SC)-2015-5-49
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADRAS)
Decided on May 15,2015

Gmg Engineering Industries Appellant
VERSUS
Issa Green Power Solution Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

RAMJI LAL VS. RADHEY SHYAM JHUNJHUNUWALA [LAWS(RAJ)-2023-9-162] [REFERRED TO]
PROF. NELLY RODRIGUES VS. IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [LAWS(BOM)-2024-10-139] [REFERRED TO]
TMT. JAYALAKSHMI VS. HOTEL SIVAPRIYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2015-7-96] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. RAYAPUDI ANNAPURNA [LAWS(TLNG)-2019-4-25] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA KUMAR VS. MANGLA DEVI [LAWS(RAJ)-2024-3-113] [REFERRED TO]
ST. INFANT JESUS THERESAS PARISH CHURCH, KANDANVILAI VS. S. VIAGAPPAN [LAWS(MAD)-2015-9-47] [REFERRED TO]
CNCC ENGINEERING PRODUCTS PVT LTD. VS. R.SANKARI [LAWS(MAD)-2016-8-99] [REFERRED TO]
SOMASUNDARAN VS. NATARAJ [LAWS(MAD)-2024-12-64] [REFERRED TO]
ASOK KUMAR VS. SANTHOSHKUMAR [LAWS(KER)-2018-11-276] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL KAYUM CHOUDHURY VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-10-22] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR BHELWA VS. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER [LAWS(CHH)-2020-2-176] [REFERRED TO]
HIMANSU SEKHAR SRICHANDAN VS. SUDHIR RANJAN PATRA [LAWS(ORI)-2022-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
MAYA RANI CHOWDHURY VS. SUKUMAR GHOSH [LAWS(CAL)-2020-2-140] [REFERRED TO]
M/S GKB OPTOLAB PVT. LTD. VS. DINESH BATRA & ANR. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-10-31] [REFERRED TO]
GKB OPTOLAB PVT LTD VS. DINESH BATRA & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2016-10-84] [REFERRED]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)These appeals arise out of common order dated 16.04.2013, passed by the High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench in C.R.P. (NPD) (MD) No.4/2013 and C.R.P. (NPD) (MD) No.5/2013 respectively, confirming the order dated 4.12.2012 passed by the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur, imposing conditions to deposit Rs.1,50,00,000/- and Rs.10,00,000/-, as a condition to condone the delay in filing the applications to set aside the ex-parte decrees passed in O.S.No.3 of 2011 and O.S. No.6 of 2011.
(3.)Appellants and respondents entered into an agreement of sale on 1.08.2008, under which the respondents agreed to purchase the property of the appellants being the factory premise for a sum of Rs.5,00,00,000/- and the respondents paid Rs.1,50,00,000/- towards part of sale consideration.
The sale transaction could not be completed. The respondents issued legal notice dated 24.11.2010 calling upon the appellants either to execute the sale deed or refund the advance amount of Rs.1,50,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. The appellants received the said notice and sent the reply offering to return the said amount but without interest. The respondents filed the suit being O.S.No.3/2011 for recovery of the sum of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- with interest. The case was adjourned from time to time on various dates. On 16.06.2011, the appellants-defendants were set ex- parte in the suit. After recording evidence adduced by the respondents- plaintiffs on 5.07.2011, the said suit was decreed ex-parte by the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.