KRISHAN YADAV Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(SC)-1994-5-11
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on May 12,1994

KRISHAN YADAV Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

DHANANJAY KUMAR MISHRA VS. BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION [LAWS(PAT)-2013-8-64] [REFERRED TO]
R. PREMA LATHA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2022-11-251] [REFERRED TO]
NAZIRA BEGUM LASHKAR VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(SC)-2000-11-61] [REFERRED]
KULDEEP SINGH DHAKA VS. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-10-68] [REFERRED TO]
DR. KUMKUM KUMARI WIFE OF DR. ARBIND KUMAR SHARMA VS. BIHAR STATE UNIVERSITIES (CONSTITUENT COLLEGES) SERVICE COMMISSION, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY [LAWS(PAT)-2010-8-179] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER PAL VS. SUGAR FEDERATION HARYANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2002-2-163] [REFERRED]
PANCHANAN SAHOO VS. HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AND ANR. [LAWS(ORI)-2008-12-118] [REFERRED TO]
MAAN SINGH VS. HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-2020-10-98] [REFERRED TO]
ABHISHEK SHARMA VS. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2021-1-153] [REFERRED TO]
ABIDABANU NAJIRKHAN MULLA VS. JILHA PARISHAD SATARA [LAWS(BOM)-2019-3-42] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ASSAM VS. PRATIMA DAS [LAWS(GAU)-1997-9-61] [REFERRED TO]
L PRIYOKUMAR SINGH VS. N BIRENDRA SINGH [LAWS(GAU)-2000-1-23] [REFERRED TO]
MANJU SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2004-12-181] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-10-178] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2008-5-79] [REFERRED TO]
SANKAR HAZRA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS [LAWS(CAL)-1998-9-67] [REFERRED TO]
TOTARAM VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOOD SAHARANPUR DIVISION [LAWS(ALL)-2011-12-149] [REFERRED TO]
S K MATHUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2011-2-125] [REFERRED TO]
SHIV KISHORE SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2014-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDAN BORGOHAIN VS. SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI [LAWS(GAU)-2020-3-162] [REFERRED TO]
SANGITA YADAV VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2006-9-26] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGIRATH & 4 ORS VS. D M , LAKHIMPUR KHERI & 2 ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-11-154] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. JYOTI KHARE VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-167] [REFERRED TO]
POORNAPRAJANA HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHAN [LAWS(KAR)-2019-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
A B NATARAJAN VS. S MADHAVAN [LAWS(MAD)-2009-7-173] [REFERRED TO]
DEPARTMENT OF HOME SCIENCE, J.D. WOMEN&APOSS COLLEGE, PATNA AND AT PRESENT RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 4/A, SHAKUNTALA GARDEN, PUNAICHAK, P.S.-SHASTRINAGAR, DIST.-PATNA VS. BIHAR STATE UNIVERSITIES [LAWS(PAT)-2010-8-103] [REFERRED TO]
SHASHI BHUSHAN VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-2015-9-52] [REFERRED TO]
CHHOTU SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1999-8-54] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN GUPTA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2000-9-151] [REFERRED]
NIRBHAY SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-1998-7-43] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. O CHAKRADHAR [LAWS(SC)-2002-2-78] [REFERRED]
PURUSHOTHAMAN VS. REGISTRAR [LAWS(KER)-1996-4-25] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA PRASAD VS. THE SIKKIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS. [LAWS(SIK)-2015-4-7] [REFERRED TO]
AMARENDER KUMAR SANDRA AND ORS. VS. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGIES AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2015-11-5] [REFERRED TO]
WELCOME VAICHEI VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(GAU)-2002-6-20] [REFERRED TO]
GIRISH SHARMA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2013-3-42] [REFERRED TO]
HARENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-8-203] [REFERRED TO]
SHASHI KANT PANDEY VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ANUSANDHAN AVAM NIYOJAN JAL SANSADHAN PRAKHAND AND [LAWS(ALL)-2003-5-126] [REFERRED TO]
NEETU SINGH VS. TELEGRAM FZ LLC [LAWS(DLH)-2022-8-157] [REFERRED TO]
KAMAL KUMAR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2017-6-41] [REFERRED TO]
T J MANJAMMA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2008-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-8-34] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV RANJAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1999-11-47] [REFERRED TO]
SUMAN KUMARI VS. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-2-139] [REFERRED TO]
OMWATI VS. STATE OF MP [LAWS(MPH)-2007-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
NANURAM YADAV VS. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(MPH)-2006-4-131] [REFERRED TO]
JASKARAN SINGH BRAR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2004-10-8] [REFERRED TO]
GIRDHARI SINGH VS. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-1998-7-42] [REFERRED TO]
INDERPREET SINGH KAHLON VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(SC)-2006-5-59] [REFERRED TO]
ASHWANI KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-2001-1-102] [REFERRED TO]
KU NALINI CHAUHAN VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2003-7-15] [REFERRED TO]
LARIHUNDASHISHA KHARDEWSAW VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2019-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
SOM NATH VS. HANDOOR EDUCATION SOCIETY [LAWS(HPH)-2016-10-49] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2008-12-116] [REFERRED TO]
SANGITA YADAV VS. GENERAL MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED [LAWS(ALL)-2006-11-232] [REFERRED TO]
MOHIT PANWAR & ORS. VS. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2016-1-127] [REFERRED TO]
VIBHA KUMARI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2015-4-54] [REFERRED TO]
VED RAJ SHARMA VS. M N MAZOOMDAR [LAWS(J&K)-1998-7-53] [REFERRED]
ONYO APANG VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-2010-3-30] [REFERRED TO]
KHALEEL AHMED K.R. AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS [LAWS(KAR)-2016-6-159] [REFERRED TO]
GAURI JHA AND ORS. VS. HARDYAL MUNICIPAL PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2009-9-371] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN JUNEJA AND ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2007-12-179] [REFERRED]
SADIQ ALI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2001-8-89] [REFERRED TO]
MANJEET SHARMA AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PRINTING, SHRI SURENDRA SINGH AND MANAGER, GOVT. OF INDIAS PRESS [LAWS(CA)-2014-3-40] [REFERRED TO]
SHAILESH PRADHAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-206] [REFERRED TO]
S.R. TEWARI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2013-5-65] [REFERRED TO]
RATAN LAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(RAJ)-1998-2-62] [REFERRED TO]
SREEJITH C P VS. KERALA STATE CO OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD [LAWS(KER)-2000-1-27] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPTHY VIJAYAKUMAR VS. JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOP SOCIETIES THRISSUR [LAWS(KER)-2008-8-16] [REFERRED TO]
DR. K.J. IVY, SELECTION GRADE LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF MALAYALAM, MAHARAJAS COLLEGE VS. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, [LAWS(KER)-2002-11-97] [REFERRED TO]
POONAM RANI & POONAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2009-10-154] [REFERRED]
STATE OF U.P VS. PARMESHWARI DAYAL [LAWS(ALL)-2023-7-185] [REFERRED TO]
NAGESH SHARMA VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(DLH)-2005-11-45] [REFERRED TO]
YOGENDRA KUMAR TIWARI VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-143] [REFERRED TO]
V KRISHNA RAO VS. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION DIRECTOR GENERAL KRISHI BHAVAN NEW DELHI [LAWS(APH)-1996-7-104] [REFERRED TO]
ADITI CHOUDHURY VS. STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(GAU)-1999-2-6] [REFERRED TO]
PONNALA PRAVEEN VS. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2017-4-54] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ASSAM VS. RIMKI BURAGOHAIN [LAWS(GAU)-2006-12-12] [REFERRED TO]
WIMMIJANE PASSAH VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(GAU)-2011-10-17] [REFERRED TO]
MANASHI GOSWAMI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2008-12-24] [REFERRED TO]
ALKA SYNTHETICS LIMITED VS. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA SEBI [LAWS(GJH)-1997-2-49] [REFERRED]
GOR KOMALBEN GAJENDRAKUMAR VS. DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER DISTRICT PANCHAYAT SABARKANTHA [LAWS(GJH)-1994-9-44] [REFERRED]
RAM PAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-3-44] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD HAROON BHAT VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2005-4-20] [REFERRED TO]
S D SRIDHAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2004-6-56] [REFERRED TO]
BASHIR AHMAD MIR VS. STATE OF J&K AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2015-8-21] [REFERRED TO]
MADHEPURASUPAULCENTRALCO-OPERATIVEBANKLTD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1995-12-28] [REFERRED TO]
HARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1994-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
ADELBERT KHARLYNGDOH VS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2014-12-5] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MEGHALAYA VS. PHIKIRBHA KHARIAH [LAWS(MEGH)-2017-11-2] [REFERRED TO]
M. SRIDHAR & ORS. VS. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR [LAWS(MAD)-2017-12-432] [REFERRED TO]
SHALINI CHINGTHAM VS. MANIPUR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(MANIP)-2019-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
MAMTA PATERIA VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2002-1-63] [REFERRED TO]
AMARBIR SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2003-7-184] [REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT RAJYA POLICE INSPECTORASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2006-3-19] [REFERRED TO]
V K SINGH 803537 NC E 00 VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(RAJ)-1997-8-21] [REFERRED TO]
AKHILESHWAR KUMAR PATHAK VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2015-8-134] [REFERRED]
UNION OF INDIA VS. AKSHAYA KUMAR NAYAK [LAWS(ORI)-2006-8-72] [REFERRED TO]
PADMAVATI VS. TIRUMALARAO [LAWS(KAR)-2021-6-21] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA KUMAR BAIRAGI VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2005-4-22] [REFERRED TO]
RENUKAMBIKE R VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2017-6-3] [REFERRED TO]
PUNAM VS. STATE OF C G [LAWS(CHH)-2008-3-45] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST [LAWS(ALL)-2005-10-80] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2007-9-156] [REFERERD TO]
SUNITA RANI VS. CHAIRMAN GREATER N O I D A [LAWS(ALL)-2007-7-173] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY KUMAR DAHIYA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2014-12-278] [REFERRED TO]
AZIZUL HAQUE QUARAISHI VS. U P S R T C [LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-64] [REFERRED TO]
COAL INDIA OFFICERS ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-1999-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
ANURIKA VAISH AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-54] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KUMAR SHUKLA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-11-61] [REFERRED TO]
PRABHAKAR KUMAR & ORS VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS [LAWS(PAT)-2016-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
RAJNIKANT OJHA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(PAT)-2014-9-38] [REFERRED TO]
SEKHAR RANJAN NATH VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2023-8-80] [REFERRED TO]
ARVIND KUMAR PIPAL VS. COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX [LAWS(ALL)-2004-1-4] [REFERRED TO]
SABITA MONDAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2014-7-34] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH PRASAD PATEL SRI BHAGWAN SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2006-4-277] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN SONKAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-4-108] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD RAMZAN SOFI VS. SHER-E-KASHMIR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY [LAWS(J&K)-2001-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
HAJIRA VS. STATE [LAWS(J&K)-2001-9-15] [REFERRED TO]
ASHITHA R.K. VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2023-2-18] [REFERRED TO]
SAPAM JITEN SINGH VS. MANIPUR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, IMPHAL [LAWS(GAU)-2012-4-53] [REFERRED TO]
SURAJ SINGH VS. MANIPUR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(GAU)-1997-11-11] [REFERRED TO]
MOHINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2000-5-20] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-1997-2-33] [REFERRED TO]
BIDHAN CHANDRA MAHATO VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2011-11-92] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-4-332] [REFERRED TO]
DR. ASHOK NIGAM VS. LUCKNOW NAGAR NIGAM [LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-212] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN DWIVEDI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2010-10-17] [REFERRED TO]
BASUDEV LENKA AND 5 ORS. VS. SHYAMA SUNDAR SAHOO AND 8 ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2008-8-119] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. JOSEPH P CHERIAN [LAWS(SC)-2005-9-92] [REFERRED TO]
SACHIN KUMAR VS. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD [LAWS(SC)-2021-3-11] [REFERRED TO]
AMARJEET SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-1994-12-90] [REFERRED]
SMT. REKHA KUMARI AND ANR. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-9-82] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-9-50] [REFERRED TO]
INDRAJIT SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-9-51] [REFERRED TO]
COASTAL PAPERS LTD VS. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-1994-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
DEB KUMAR BARMAN VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-1994-9-46] [REFERRED]
RANVIJAY NARAYAN SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CA)-2014-1-8] [REFERRED TO]
VARIA JAYESHKUMAR BILINDRABHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2020-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
ASIM KUMAR GIRI AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2016-3-28] [REFERRED TO]
AKTARUL ISLAM KAYAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2020-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
AKTARUL ISLAM KAYAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2020-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN LAL SINGH MISHRI LAL SINGH VS. BASIC EDUCATION BOARD [LAWS(ALL)-2004-1-38] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH SINGH VS. VIDYADHIRAJ PANDEY [LAWS(ALL)-2006-7-204] [REFFERED TO]
DESALE KIRAN SURESHRAO VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-37] [REFERRED TO]
NISSAR AHMAD PARRAY VS. STATE [LAWS(J&K)-2001-2-23] [REFERRED TO]
JASHUBANTA SARMAH VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2009-7-33] [REFERRED TO]
MUMTAJ ALI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2005-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTA CHOUDHURY VS. PRABIR KUMAR DAS [LAWS(GAU)-1994-9-17] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ RANI SEKHRI VS. U P GOVT [LAWS(ALL)-1954-2-3] [REFERRED TO]
P VADIVEL VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA NEW DELHI [LAWS(MAD)-2009-1-114] [REFERRED TO]
SATYAWAN YADAV VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2011-12-106] [REFERRED TO]
LALITHAMMA VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANGERE DISTRICT [LAWS(KAR)-2008-12-46] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF J. & K. VS. SURINDER SINGH [LAWS(J&K)-2017-7-5] [REFERRED TO]
BAROT JIGNESH LAKSHMANSINH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2003-4-34] [REFERRED]
YOGVENDER SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2007-3-483] [REFERRED]
KULDEEP KAUR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2001-11-83] [REFERRED TO]
ANJUM SHEKH VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2010-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KRISHNA BANIK VS. TRIPURA GRAMIN BANK [LAWS(TRIP)-2016-3-94] [REFERRED]
MAHIPAL SINGH TOMAR VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2013-5-103] [REFERRED TO]
PRITPAL SINGH RAM NIWAS RAJINDER HAR GOPAL YADAV HEAD CONSTABLE HANS RAJ PHOOL SINGH JAT BHAGWAN SINGH MANN DINESH YADAV VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(SC)-1994-7-89] [DISTINGUISHED]
AMARBIR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2013-5-366] [REFERRED TO]
VIMLESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-499] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

MOHAN - (1.)BOTH these cases can be dealt with under a common judgment since what arises for our consideration is the validity of selection of Taxation Inspectors by the Subordinate Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). The appellants are unsuccessful candidates.
(2.)THE Board issued an advertisement bearing No. 5 of 1986 on 22-11-86 inviting applications for 96 posts for Taxation Inspectors in Excise and Taxation Department. Out of these 96 posts 24 were reserved for scheduled castes, 10 for backward classes and 17 for ex-servicemen of Haryana. THE minimum qualification was graduation of a recognised University or equivalent and knowledge of Hindi up to Matric level. THE selection was to be made on the basis of written test of 250 marks and viva voce test. THE candidate will not be eligible unless he obtained 33 per cent marks in each subject and the minimum of 40 per cent in the aggregate. In response to the advertisement many candidates applied but for some reason the written test could not be conducted.
The Board again advertised for the very same number of 96 posts of Taxation Inspectors as per the Advertisement No. 3 of 1988 dated 7-7-88. The reservation was as was done previously. The other conditions and qualifications were also the same. It was mentioned in this advertisement that those candidates who had earlier applied against Board's Advertisement No. 5 of 1986 and were eligible according to the prescribed qualifications, need not apply again. The previous applications would be considered for these posts. It requires to be stated at this stage that the Board first allotted roll numbers to the applicants who applied in 1986 then to the candidates who applied in 1988. The continuity of the roll numbers was maintained.

The Board conducted the written examination at various centres in the State of Haryana on 17-12-88 and 18-12-88. On receipt of the answer books from different centres a key book was got prepared by the Secretary of the Board with the help of the confidential branch. This key book contained the following particulars :

(i) The name of the candidate with the parent's name.

(ii) Roll No.

(iii) The details of the subject of the written test.

(3.)FICTITIOUS roll numbers were allotted to each candidate in the key book by removing the original roll number slips. Thereafter, the answer books were sent to different examiners for evaluation. After examining the answer books, the examiners were required to prepare an award list which is a summary indicating the fictitious roll number of the candidates and the marks obtained by them in each subject. On receipt of the answer books the marks obtained by the candidates in each subject were entered in the key book. On the basis of the key book award lists and answer books, the result of the written test was prepared by the Board. Thereafter the same was published by displaying it on the notice board.
Any candidate who desired to get his answer book re-checked could do so within a period of 30 days from the declaration of the result of written test only after depositing the prescribed fee. Such a procedure was indicated in the rules. This was also the practice prevalent in the Board.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.