PARVEZ QADIR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(SC)-1974-10-20
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on October 16,1974

PARVEZ QADIR Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

PALLABI KALITA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2009-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
SUBASH CHANDRA DAS VS. REGISTRAR (AMN.), ORISSA HIGH COURT [LAWS(ORI)-2009-1-52] [REFERRED TO]
SOUMITRA HAZRA VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD [LAWS(CAL)-2019-9-55] [REFERRED TO]
LAL CHAND DANDORIYA THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES VS. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL JAIPUR AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-1992-9-54] [REFERRED]
ASWINI KUMAR RAY VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2008-10-4] [REFERRED TO]
SURINDAR KAUR RAI VS. JYOTI RANJAN BANERJEE [LAWS(CAL)-2001-5-44] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMED MUSTAFA ANSARI VS. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2013-3-97] [REFERRED TO]
SACHIN KUMA RAIRAN VS. MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY [LAWS(RAJ)-2022-7-262] [REFERRED TO]
B.N. DEY VS. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) [LAWS(CAL)-1976-3-45] [REFERRED TO]
SUBHENDU BANERJEE VS. SHOVAN KUMAR RUJ [LAWS(CAL)-2005-5-66] [REFERRED TO]
K B VASIST VS. HONERABLE CHIEF JUSTICE [LAWS(DLH)-1993-3-34] [REFERRED AND APPLIED]
MAKHAN SINGH VS. PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, LUDHIANA [LAWS(P&H)-1995-1-234] [REFERRED]
KRUSHNACHANDRASAHU VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(SC)-1995-9-1] [REFERRED TO]
MOHINDER SINGH CHHIKARA HARI SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-1990-12-4] [REFERRED TO]
R.C.SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(HPH)-1983-6-8] [REFERRED TO]
THE SECRETARY VS. SEEMA I. [LAWS(KER)-2014-10-168] [REFERRED TO]
H. P. CHOTHIA VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(GJH)-1977-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
ASHA KUSHWAH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2018-10-51] [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-1980-9-37] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR VS. ABDUL HAMID [LAWS(J&K)-1996-8-21] [REFERRED TO]
O P SHARMA VS. UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK, JAIPUR AND ANOTHER [LAWS(RAJ)-1992-6-14] [REFERRED]
S K MEHTA VS. P G I OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH [LAWS(P&H)-1993-10-186] [REFERRED]
JOSE PAUL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-1993-3-25] [FOLLOWED ON]
K PRASAD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1987-12-25] [DISTINGUISHED]
Suba Singh Aulakh VS. Union of India [LAWS(MPH)-1997-12-36] [REFERRED TO]
PRIYANKA SHARMA VS. STATE (AYURVED DEPARTMENT) [LAWS(RAJ)-2014-4-179] [REFERRED TO]
R S DASS MRS K GOYAL PRITAM SINGH AJIT SINGH NAGPAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1986-12-70] [RELIED ON]
SHASHI SHEKHAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CA)-2013-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
MALOJIRAO B. BHOSALE VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2016-8-50] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. PREM LATA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. [LAWS(P&H)-1978-4-28] [REFERRED]
A K SHIMPI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1982-9-9] [REFERRED TO]
R.G. PRASAD AND ANR. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-1984-8-85] [REFERRED TO]
SWADESHI COTTON MILLS COMPANY LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1978-2-13] [REFERRED TO]
J S JAMWAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(J&K)-1985-4-10] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR VS. GOVT. OF N.C.T. [LAWS(CA)-2014-9-65] [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR GENERAL R S TARAGI DY COMMANDANT COLLEGE OF COMBAT VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-1994-7-44] [REFERRED TO]
B R KULKARNI DR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1979-11-14] [REFERRED]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This petition is the second round in the challenge of the initial recruitment to the Indian Forest Service from amongst the gazetted officers of the Forest Service of each State. By Section 2 of the All India Services Act, LXI of 1951 - hereinafter called 'the Act', the Indian Administrative Service and the Indian Police Service, which were constituted before the Act, were recognised as All-India Services. Subsequently by the All India Services (Amendment) Act, 1963, enacted on September 6, 1963 Section 2-A was added providing for constitution of three other All India Services of which the Indian Forest Service was one. Section 3 of the Act dealt with the regulation of recruitment and conditions of service. It provided:
"(1) The Central Government may after consultation with the governments of the States concerned including the State of Jammu and Kashmir, make rules for the regulation of recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to an All India Service.

(2) All rules made under this section shall be laid for not less than fourteen days before Parliament as soon as possible after they are made, and shall be subject to such modifications, whether by way of repeal or amendment, as Parliament may make on a motion made during the session in which they are so laid."

Section 4 of the Act dealt with continuance of existing rules which Prior to the Act were applicable to an All India Service and those rules were deemed to be rules made under the Act.

(2.)In order to constitute and bring into being the All India Forest Service the Central Government issued a notification dated July 1, 1966 under Section 2-A of the Act and immediately thereafter in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of S. 3 of the Act made certain Rules, namely, the Indian Forest Service (Cadre) Rules, 1966 - hereinafter referred to as "the Cadre Rules", and the Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules, 19 - hereinafter referred to as "the Recruitment Rules". By Rule 3 of the Cadre Rules the Indian Forest Service Cadre was constituted for each State or group of States and the cadre so constituted was to be referred as a "State Cadre", or, as the case may, a "Joint Cadre". The strength and composition of each of the cadres was dealt with by Rule 4 of the Cadre Rules under which the strength and composition of each of the cadres constituted under Rule 3 was to be determined by regulations made by the Central Government in consultation with the State Governments in that behalf. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 4 of the Cadre Rules further provided that the Central Government shall, at the interval of every three years, re-examine the strength and composition of each such cadre in consultation with the State Government concerned and may make such alterations therein as it deems fit. There are also two provisos to the rule by and under which the Central Government had the power to alter the strength and composition of any cadre at any other time and similarly the State Government we also empowered to add for a period not exceeding one year, and with the approval of the Central Government for a further period not exceeding two years, to a State or Joint Cadre one or more posts carrying duties or responsibilities of a like nature to cadre posts. Rule 5 provided for the allocation of members to various cadres by the Central Government m consultation with the State Government concerned. It also empowered the Central Government, with the concurrence of the State Government concerned, to transfer a cadre officer from one cadre to another cadre. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 4 of the Cadre Rules, the Central Government, in consultation with the State Governments, framed the Indian Forest Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1966, fixing the strength and composition of the cadres of the Indian Forest Service in each of the States as specified in the Schedule annexed thereto, with effect from October 1,1966. It also made, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (l) of Rule 4 of the Recruitment Rules, after consultation with the State Governments and the Union Public Service Commissions the Indian Forest Service (Initial Recruitment) Regulations, 1966, which came into force with effect from July 1, 1966.
(3.)It may be mentioned that under sub-r. (1) of R. 4 of the Recruitment Rules the Central Government was enjoined, as soon as may be after the commencement of the Rules, to recruit to the Service any person from amongst the members of the State Forest Service adjudged suitable in accordance with such regulations as the Central Government may make in consultation with the State Governments and the Commission, provided that no member holding a post referred to in sub-cl. (ii) of clause (g) of Rule a and so recruited shall, at the time of recruitment, be allocated to any State cadre other than the cadre of a Union territory. Sub-rule (2) of R. 4 of the Recruitment Rules deals with the subsequent recruitment and prescribes the different methods of recruitment under clauses (a), (act) and (b) of the said sub-rule. We are not concerned with sub-rule (2) or with other sub-rules of Rule 4 and consequently these may be ignored. Rule 5 of the Recruitment Rules deals with dis-qualifications for appointment, such as for instance (l) a person who is not a citizen of India or does not belong to such categories of persons as may, from time to time; be notified in that behalf by the Central Government; (2) a person who has more than one wife living or who having a spouse living marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the lifetime of such spouse; (3) or a married woman; (4) or a woman who is married to any person who has a wife living, - were considered to be not eligible for appointment to the service, subject however to the power of the Central Government to exempt them from the operation of either sub-rule (2) or sub-rule (4) when it is satisfied that there are special grounds for doing so.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.