LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. M K GUPTA
LAWS(SC)-1993-11-19
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on November 05,1993

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant
VERSUS
M.K.GUPTA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

ROHTAS SINGH VS. COMMISSIONER AGRA DIVISION [LAWS(ALL)-1996-11-44] [REFERRED]
ROHTAS SINGH VS. COMMISSIONER AGRA DIVISION [LAWS(ALL)-1996-11-44] [REFERRED]
HINDUSTAN MOTORS LTD VS. AMARDEEP SINGH WIRK [LAWS(DLH)-2009-5-126] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN MOTORS LTD VS. AMARDEEP SINGH WIRK [LAWS(DLH)-2009-5-126] [REFERRED TO]
Kumar Trading Co LLC VS. Union of India UOI [LAWS(CAL)-2001-5-34] [REFERRED TO]
Kumar Trading Co LLC VS. Union of India UOI [LAWS(CAL)-2001-5-34] [REFERRED TO]
MANDIRA MOOKERJEE VS. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(CAL)-2004-12-34] [REFERRED TO]
MANDIRA MOOKERJEE VS. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(CAL)-2004-12-34] [REFERRED TO]
P GANGADHARAN PILLAI VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1995-7-23] [REFERRED TO]
P GANGADHARAN PILLAI VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1995-7-23] [REFERRED TO]
M.NANDINI VS. SRIMITRA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(APCDRC)-2008-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
M.NANDINI VS. SRIMITRA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(APCDRC)-2008-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
M.KRISHNA KUMARI VS. PROJECT MANAGER [LAWS(APCDRC)-2010-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
M.KRISHNA KUMARI VS. PROJECT MANAGER [LAWS(APCDRC)-2010-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. A B SHAH [LAWS(SC)-1996-5-90] [FOLLOWED]
UNION OF INDIA VS. A B SHAH [LAWS(SC)-1996-5-90] [FOLLOWED]
LATA CONSTRUCTION VS. RAMESHCHANDRA RAMNIKLAL SHAH [LAWS(SC)-1999-8-80] [REFERRED]
LATA CONSTRUCTION VS. RAMESHCHANDRA RAMNIKLAL SHAH [LAWS(SC)-1999-8-80] [REFERRED]
COMMON CAUSE A REGISTERED SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1999-8-44] [REFERRED]
COMMON CAUSE A REGISTERED SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1999-8-44] [REFERRED]
MOHAMMAD IQBAL AND ANR VS. STATE OF U P AND 4 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-9-124] [REFERRED]
MOHAMMAD IQBAL AND ANR VS. STATE OF U P AND 4 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-9-124] [REFERRED]
H P HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS VS. RAVI BHUSHAN S/O LEKH RAJ SOOD [LAWS(HPCDRC)-2010-3-2] [REFERRED TO]
H P HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS VS. RAVI BHUSHAN S/O LEKH RAJ SOOD [LAWS(HPCDRC)-2010-3-2] [REFERRED TO]
KAUSHAL KISHOR VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-8] [REFERRED TO]
KAUSHAL KISHOR VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-8] [REFERRED TO]
BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS VS. D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES [LAWS(SC)-2024-5-44] [REFERRED TO]
BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS VS. D. K. GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES [LAWS(SC)-2024-5-44] [REFERRED TO]
SANTHOSHIMA PARBOILED MODERN RICE MILL GASDIPALLY VILLAGE VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR NALGONDA DISTRICT [LAWS(APH)-2010-6-54] [REFERRED TO]
SANTHOSHIMA PARBOILED MODERN RICE MILL GASDIPALLY VILLAGE VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR NALGONDA DISTRICT [LAWS(APH)-2010-6-54] [REFERRED TO]
BIKRAM CHATTERJI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2019-7-89] [REFERRED TO]
BIKRAM CHATTERJI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2019-7-89] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C. EX. VS. J.K. SYNTHETICS LTD. [LAWS(CE)-1999-3-234] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C. EX. VS. J.K. SYNTHETICS LTD. [LAWS(CE)-1999-3-234] [REFERRED TO]
ATUL CH. SARMA VS. PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2003-12-76] [REFERRED TO]
ATUL CH. SARMA VS. PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2003-12-76] [REFERRED TO]
SHAILENDRA RAI VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(ALL)-2009-10-6] [RELIED ON]
SHAILENDRA RAI VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(ALL)-2009-10-6] [RELIED ON]
DEO DATT SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
DEO DATT SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-10-178] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-10-178] [REFERRED TO]
BIPINCHANDRA P PATEL VS. ANAND AREA DEVE AUTHORITY [LAWS(GJH)-2001-4-46] [REFFERED]
BIPINCHANDRA P PATEL VS. ANAND AREA DEVE AUTHORITY [LAWS(GJH)-2001-4-46] [REFFERED]
GUJARAT FOREST PRODUCERS GATHERERS and FOREST WORKERS VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2004-4-42] [REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT FOREST PRODUCERS GATHERERS and FOREST WORKERS VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2004-4-42] [REFERRED TO]
NALINI PRADHAN VS. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CESCO [LAWS(ORI)-2014-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
NALINI PRADHAN VS. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CESCO [LAWS(ORI)-2014-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
J K ACRYLICS VS. UNION OF INDIA UOI [LAWS(RAJ)-1997-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
J K ACRYLICS VS. UNION OF INDIA UOI [LAWS(RAJ)-1997-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
ASHISH KUMAR SHARMA VS. SECRETARY MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA MANDAL BHOPAL [LAWS(MPH)-1999-9-62] [REFERRED TO]
ASHISH KUMAR SHARMA VS. SECRETARY MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA MANDAL BHOPAL [LAWS(MPH)-1999-9-62] [REFERRED TO]
AMOD KUMAR VS. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(PAT)-2011-1-118] [REFERRED TO]
AMOD KUMAR VS. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(PAT)-2011-1-118] [REFERRED TO]
GIRIDHAR KUMAR SHARMA VS. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN [LAWS(PAT)-2011-4-311] [REFERRED]
RABINDRA NATH GHOSAL VS. UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA [LAWS(SC)-2002-9-93] [REFERRED]
RABINDRA NATH GHOSAL VS. UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA [LAWS(SC)-2002-9-93] [REFERRED]
GIRIDHAR KUMAR SHARMA VS. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN [LAWS(PAT)-2011-4-311] [REFERRED]
SUN DIRECT TV PVT LTD VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-88] [REFERRED TO]
SUN DIRECT TV PVT LTD VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-88] [REFERRED TO]
JAI SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-140] [REFERRED TO]
JAI SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-7-140] [REFERRED TO]
TOOLS INTERNATIONAL AND ORS VS. RAMNIKLAL JETHALAL SHAH AND ORS [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2011-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
TOOLS INTERNATIONAL AND ORS VS. RAMNIKLAL JETHALAL SHAH AND ORS [LAWS(MHCDRC)-2011-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SATHAR VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2021-2-283] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SATHAR VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2021-2-283] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA VS. DISTRICT JUDGE [LAWS(ALL)-2013-7-242] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA VS. DISTRICT JUDGE [LAWS(ALL)-2013-7-242] [REFERRED TO]
VANDANA TRAVELS & TOURS VS. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-86] [REFERRED TO]
VANDANA TRAVELS & TOURS VS. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-86] [REFERRED TO]
TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED VS. MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY [LAWS(ET)-2012-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED VS. MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY [LAWS(ET)-2012-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED VS. MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY [LAWS(ET)-2012-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED VS. MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY [LAWS(ET)-2012-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
R. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-2-132] [REFERRED TO]
R. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-2-132] [REFERRED TO]
V P SANT VS. CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1995-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
V P SANT VS. CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1995-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY R KOTHARI VS. SOUTH MUMBAI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-74] [REFERRED]
SANJAY R KOTHARI VS. SOUTH MUMBAI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-74] [REFERRED]
IN THE MATTER OF : AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTIES VS. THE REGISTRAR TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(NCD)-2003-1-175] [REFERRED TO]
IN THE MATTER OF : AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTIES VS. THE REGISTRAR TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(NCD)-2003-1-175] [REFERRED TO]
B K PRABHA VS. SECRETARY KENDRIYA UPADYARASANGA [LAWS(NCD)-2003-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
B K PRABHA VS. SECRETARY KENDRIYA UPADYARASANGA [LAWS(NCD)-2003-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. YOGESH CHANDRA GUPTA [LAWS(NCD)-2004-10-29] [RELIED ON]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. YOGESH CHANDRA GUPTA [LAWS(NCD)-2004-10-29] [RELIED ON]
ANILKUMAR HIRALAL PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-43] [REFERRED TO]
ANILKUMAR HIRALAL PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-43] [REFERRED TO]
PRAVEEN MEHTA VS. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-27] [REFERRED TO]
PRAVEEN MEHTA VS. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-27] [REFERRED TO]
CANARA BANK VS. BINAY KUMAR JHA [LAWS(NCD)-2008-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
CANARA BANK VS. BINAY KUMAR JHA [LAWS(NCD)-2008-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
POST MASTER AND ORS. VS. KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI [LAWS(NCD)-2005-7-102] [REFERRED TO]
POST MASTER AND ORS. VS. KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI [LAWS(NCD)-2005-7-102] [REFERRED TO]
JAI PAL PURI VS. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2007-10-1] [REFERRED TO]
JAI PAL PURI VS. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2007-10-1] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER VS. KRISHAN PAL CHANDER [LAWS(NCD)-2009-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER VS. KRISHAN PAL CHANDER [LAWS(NCD)-2009-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
SR. SUPDT. OF POST OFFICES, GPO BUILDING VS. SHARANJIT SINGH BAHM [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
SR. SUPDT. OF POST OFFICES, GPO BUILDING VS. SHARANJIT SINGH BAHM [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
NARINDER KUMAR SUNEJA VS. R.K. GOEL [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-22] [REFERRED TO]
NARINDER KUMAR SUNEJA VS. R.K. GOEL [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-22] [REFERRED TO]
HUDA VS. MAJOR K.L. MONGA [LAWS(NCD)-2012-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
HUDA VS. MAJOR K.L. MONGA [LAWS(NCD)-2012-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
SHIKHA BIRLA VS. DLF RETAILERS DEVELOPERS LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2013-2-54] [REFERRED TO]
SHIKHA BIRLA VS. DLF RETAILERS DEVELOPERS LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2013-2-54] [REFERRED TO]
GANGA PATIL VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER [LAWS(NCD)-2013-1-13] [REFERRED TO]
GANGA PATIL VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER [LAWS(NCD)-2013-1-13] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KHANNA VS. SHASHI SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2012-9-44] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KHANNA VS. SHASHI SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2012-9-44] [REFERRED TO]
UNITECH LTD VS. ABHA MULLICK & ANR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-5-209] [REFERRED]
UNITECH LTD VS. ABHA MULLICK & ANR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-5-209] [REFERRED]
AMITA BANTA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2009-12-40] [REFERRED TO]
AMITA BANTA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2009-12-40] [REFERRED TO]
NAJMUNNISA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT FORT ST GEORGE CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-6-411] [REFERRED TO]
NAJMUNNISA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT FORT ST GEORGE CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-6-411] [REFERRED TO]
VKC FOOTSTEPS INDIA PVT. LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2020-7-271] [REFERRED TO]
VKC FOOTSTEPS INDIA PVT. LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2020-7-271] [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN [LAWS(ALL)-1997-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN [LAWS(ALL)-1997-2-1] [REFERRED TO]
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SYNDICATE BANK [LAWS(SC)-2007-5-90] [REFERRED TO]
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SYNDICATE BANK [LAWS(SC)-2007-5-90] [REFERRED TO]
MYSORE PAPER MILLS LIMITED VS. MYSORE PAPER MILLS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION [LAWS(SC)-2002-1-20] [REFERRED 5.]
MYSORE PAPER MILLS LIMITED VS. MYSORE PAPER MILLS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION [LAWS(SC)-2002-1-20] [REFERRED 5.]
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY [LAWS(SC)-2011-10-32] [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY [LAWS(SC)-2011-10-32] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. KUM D PHAWA, MCS, EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-3] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. KUM D PHAWA, MCS, EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-3] [REFERRED TO]
RURAL ENTITLEMENT AND LEGAL SUPPORT CENTRE (REGD.), BHOPAL, BRANCH GWALIOR VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2000-10-75] [REFERRED TO]
RURAL ENTITLEMENT AND LEGAL SUPPORT CENTRE (REGD.), BHOPAL, BRANCH GWALIOR VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2000-10-75] [REFERRED TO]
DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL (HILLS) PRIVATE LIMITED VS. KAMLA WATI [LAWS(HRCDRC)-2005-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
DALMIA RESORTS INTERNATIONAL (HILLS) PRIVATE LIMITED VS. KAMLA WATI [LAWS(HRCDRC)-2005-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
HSBC ASSET MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT LTD VS. MANI RAO [LAWS(APH)-2011-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
HSBC ASSET MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT LTD VS. MANI RAO [LAWS(APH)-2011-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
DHARMENDRA SHARMA VS. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(SC)-2024-9-12] [REFERRED TO]
DHARMENDRA SHARMA VS. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(SC)-2024-9-12] [REFERRED TO]
KIPA BABU VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-1998-7-11] [REFERRED TO]
KIPA BABU VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-1998-7-11] [REFERRED TO]
ORISSA CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ORI)-2011-1-19] [REFERRED TO]
ORISSA CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ORI)-2011-1-19] [REFERRED TO]
PRESIDENT MALIKDHINAR ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL VS. A BABUDEEN [LAWS(MAD)-2005-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
PRESIDENT MALIKDHINAR ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL VS. A BABUDEEN [LAWS(MAD)-2005-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
MANIMALAN VS. K SUBRAYAN [LAWS(MAD)-2004-4-212] [REFERRED TO]
MANIMALAN VS. K SUBRAYAN [LAWS(MAD)-2004-4-212] [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSAL CONSORTIUM OFENGINEERS (P) LTD. VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-139] [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSAL CONSORTIUM OFENGINEERS (P) LTD. VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-139] [REFERRED TO]
FAIR AIR ENGINEERS P LTD VS. N K MODI [LAWS(SC)-1996-8-213] [REFERRED TO]
FAIR AIR ENGINEERS P LTD VS. N K MODI [LAWS(SC)-1996-8-213] [REFERRED TO]
DUSHYANT KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-8-22] [REFERRED TO]
DUSHYANT KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-8-22] [REFERRED TO]
JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND REGISTERING OFFICER VS. KESAR LAL [LAWS(SC)-2020-3-58] [REFERRED TO]
JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND REGISTERING OFFICER VS. KESAR LAL [LAWS(SC)-2020-3-58] [REFERRED TO]
NARSINGH RAI VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, VARANASI, AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-7-167] [REFERRED TO]
NARSINGH RAI VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, VARANASI, AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-7-167] [REFERRED TO]
T R DINAKARAN VS. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(MAD)-2012-3-309] [REFERRED TO]
T R DINAKARAN VS. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(MAD)-2012-3-309] [REFERRED TO]
KISHOR P MASTAKAR VS. NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-1994-6-26] [REFERRED TO]
KISHOR P MASTAKAR VS. NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-1994-6-26] [REFERRED TO]
P VISWANATHAN VS. A K BURMAN [LAWS(CAL)-2002-10-28] [REFERRED TO]
P VISWANATHAN VS. A K BURMAN [LAWS(CAL)-2002-10-28] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN S. KALE VS. CHHAYA MOHAN KALA HILLARI VICTOR DSOUZA [LAWS(NCD)-2024-11-60] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN S. KALE VS. CHHAYA MOHAN KALA HILLARI VICTOR DSOUZA [LAWS(NCD)-2024-11-60] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RASHEED KHAN VS. MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. DATE OF DECISION : <RP>01-07-2022 [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-34] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RASHEED KHAN VS. MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. DATE OF DECISION : <RP>01-07-2022 [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-34] [REFERRED TO]
JITEN KUMAR DALAI VS. ANTRIKSH REALTECH (P) LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2022-10-70] [REFERRED TO]
JITEN KUMAR DALAI VS. ANTRIKSH REALTECH (P) LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2022-10-70] [REFERRED TO]
ABHAY RASHMIKANT YAGNIK VS. CCI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-18] [REFERRED TO]
ABHAY RASHMIKANT YAGNIK VS. CCI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-18] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY MALLAPPA MUCHANDIKAR VS. BELGAUM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BELGAUM [LAWS(KAR)-2011-3-57] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY MALLAPPA MUCHANDIKAR VS. BELGAUM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BELGAUM [LAWS(KAR)-2011-3-57] [REFERRED TO]
KANSHI RAM VS. MARUTI UDYOG LTD [LAWS(NCD)-1996-12-45] [REFERRED]
KANSHI RAM VS. MARUTI UDYOG LTD [LAWS(NCD)-1996-12-45] [REFERRED]
AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VS. SANJAY KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2002-7-72] [REFERRED TO]
AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VS. SANJAY KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2002-7-72] [REFERRED TO]
VOLUNTARY ORGANISATION IN INTEREST OF CONSUMER EDUCATION VOICE VS. REGISTRAR TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(NCD)-2003-1-64] [REFERRED TO]
VOLUNTARY ORGANISATION IN INTEREST OF CONSUMER EDUCATION VOICE VS. REGISTRAR TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(NCD)-2003-1-64] [REFERRED TO]
MANSUKHBHAI GANDABHAI PATEL VS. JAGDISHBHAI MAVJIBHAI PATEL [LAWS(NCD)-2003-2-238] [REFERRED]
MANSUKHBHAI GANDABHAI PATEL VS. JAGDISHBHAI MAVJIBHAI PATEL [LAWS(NCD)-2003-2-238] [REFERRED]
ASHOKA INFROWAYS P.LTD. VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2024-10-10] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOKA INFROWAYS P.LTD. VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2024-10-10] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEE VS. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2018-1-124] [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEE VS. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2018-1-124] [REFERRED TO]
ARVINDER SETHI VS. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2019-8-104] [REFERRED TO]
ARVINDER SETHI VS. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2019-8-104] [REFERRED TO]
BHUPENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-11-115] [REFERRED TO]
BHUPENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-11-115] [REFERRED TO]
RAJNISH BHARDWAJ VS. CHD. DEVELOPERS LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2019-11-82] [REFERRED TO]
RAJNISH BHARDWAJ VS. CHD. DEVELOPERS LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2019-11-82] [REFERRED TO]
EMAAR MGF LAND LTD & ANR VS. GAGAN GUPTA & 2 ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2018-5-20] [REFERRED TO]
EMAAR MGF LAND LTD & ANR VS. GAGAN GUPTA & 2 ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2018-5-20] [REFERRED TO]
CHHATTISAGARH GRIH NIRMAN PROJECT DIVISION DURG VS. RAKESH KUMAR BORKAR S/O SHRI KEWAL SINGH BORKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2017-3-81] [REFERRED TO]
CHHATTISAGARH GRIH NIRMAN PROJECT DIVISION DURG VS. RAKESH KUMAR BORKAR S/O SHRI KEWAL SINGH BORKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2017-3-81] [REFERRED TO]
S P THIRUMALA RAO VS. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
S P THIRUMALA RAO VS. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
YASH BIR JAGGI VS. UNITECH LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-87] [REFERRED TO]
YASH BIR JAGGI VS. UNITECH LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-87] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS. KORAMUTTA PULLANA NAGANNA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-5-14] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD VS. KORAMUTTA PULLANA NAGANNA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-5-14] [REFERRED TO]
BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. SASMITA MOHARANA [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-16] [RELIED ON]
BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. SASMITA MOHARANA [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-16] [RELIED ON]
ROURKELA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SARASWATHI BEURA [LAWS(NCD)-2007-5-41] [RELIED ON]
ROURKELA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SARASWATHI BEURA [LAWS(NCD)-2007-5-41] [RELIED ON]
RAM SAROOP VS. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD [LAWS(NCD)-2007-9-21] [REFERRED TO]
RAM SAROOP VS. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD [LAWS(NCD)-2007-9-21] [REFERRED TO]
NIRMAL KUMAR PANDEY AND ORS. VS. KOLLATI CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
NIRMAL KUMAR PANDEY AND ORS. VS. KOLLATI CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. PARVEEN KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-1-99] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. PARVEEN KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-1-99] [REFERRED TO]
M/S AKASH GANGA AIRLINES LTD VS. ARYAVRAT GRAMIN BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2013-8-24] [REFERRED TO]
M/S AKASH GANGA AIRLINES LTD VS. ARYAVRAT GRAMIN BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2013-8-24] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. IDEAL ENGINEERS [LAWS(APH)-2001-8-146] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. IDEAL ENGINEERS [LAWS(APH)-2001-8-146] [REFERRED TO]
C V RATNAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2001-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
C V RATNAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2001-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
STATE GOVT OF BIHAR VS. SUNIL KUMAR SINGH [LAWS(PAT)-1998-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
STATE GOVT OF BIHAR VS. SUNIL KUMAR SINGH [LAWS(PAT)-1998-3-14] [REFERRED TO]
SUNDERLAL PATEL AND ORS. VS. THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2016-4-76] [REFERRED TO]
SUNDERLAL PATEL AND ORS. VS. THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2016-4-76] [REFERRED TO]
J&K HOUSING BOARD VS. ROMESH CHANDER GUPTA [LAWS(J&K)-2002-8-19] [REFERRED TO]
J&K HOUSING BOARD VS. ROMESH CHANDER GUPTA [LAWS(J&K)-2002-8-19] [REFERRED TO]
DYANI ANTONY PAUL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2020-12-254] [REFERRED TO]
DYANI ANTONY PAUL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2020-12-254] [REFERRED TO]
RENADEVAN VS. EZHUPUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYAT [LAWS(KER)-2010-1-61] [REFERRED TO]
RENADEVAN VS. EZHUPUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYAT [LAWS(KER)-2010-1-61] [REFERRED TO]
BIPIN KUMAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2019-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
BIPIN KUMAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2019-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV ENTERPRISES VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2010-2-124] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV ENTERPRISES VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2010-2-124] [REFERRED TO]
DEV SINGH VS. U T CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2012-5-29] [REFERRED TO]
DEV SINGH VS. U T CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2012-5-29] [REFERRED TO]
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-12-27] [REFERRED TO]
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-12-27] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD VS. M MADHUSUDHAN REDDY [LAWS(SC)-2012-1-60] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD VS. M MADHUSUDHAN REDDY [LAWS(SC)-2012-1-60] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDER JAIN VS. ALAKNANDA CO OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2013-4-113] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDER JAIN VS. ALAKNANDA CO OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2013-4-113] [REFERRED TO]
C VENKATACHALAM VS. AJITKUMAR C SHAH [LAWS(SC)-2011-8-81] [REFERRED TO]
C VENKATACHALAM VS. AJITKUMAR C SHAH [LAWS(SC)-2011-8-81] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC. VS. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2009-5-270] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC. VS. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2009-5-270] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. BALBIR SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2004-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. BALBIR SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2004-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
Bhupendra and Another VS. State of U.P.and Others [LAWS(ALL)-2011-11-233] [REFERRED TO]
Bhupendra and Another VS. State of U.P.and Others [LAWS(ALL)-2011-11-233] [REFERRED TO]
SAKE CHANDRAYUDU VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2015-4-69] [REFERRED TO]
SAKE CHANDRAYUDU VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2015-4-69] [REFERRED TO]
V KAMALA VS. AP STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION REGISTRAR KHAIRTABAD HYDERABAD [LAWS(APH)-2010-3-46] [REFERRED TO]
V KAMALA VS. AP STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION REGISTRAR KHAIRTABAD HYDERABAD [LAWS(APH)-2010-3-46] [REFERRED TO]
ILALAYAKONJER VS. ASSAM AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY [LAWS(GAU)-2003-6-25] [REFERRED TO]
ILALAYAKONJER VS. ASSAM AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY [LAWS(GAU)-2003-6-25] [REFERRED TO]
N. DHAKSHAYINI VS. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2013-3-56] [REFERRED TO]
N. DHAKSHAYINI VS. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2013-3-56] [REFERRED TO]
NAVNEET PUBLICATIONS INDIA LIMITED VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-2009-8-190] [REFERRED TO]
NAVNEET PUBLICATIONS INDIA LIMITED VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-2009-8-190] [REFERRED TO]
CALCUTTA SOUTH TRANSPORT CO. VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-3-251] [REFERRED TO]
CALCUTTA SOUTH TRANSPORT CO. VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-3-251] [REFERRED TO]
COMMON CAUSE A REGISTERED SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1996-9-148] [RELIED ON]
COMMON CAUSE A REGISTERED SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1996-9-148] [RELIED ON]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2000-5-67] [REFERRED]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2000-5-67] [REFERRED]
KASI HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED VS. M M KALAISELVI [LAWS(MAD)-1999-3-72] [REFERRED TO]
KASI HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED VS. M M KALAISELVI [LAWS(MAD)-1999-3-72] [REFERRED TO]
R RAVICHANDRAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2001-10-88] [REFERRED TO]
R RAVICHANDRAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2001-10-88] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH METAL VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2014-8-303] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH METAL VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2014-8-303] [REFERRED TO]
BIDHU BHUSAN CHANDRA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2009-3-133] [REFERRED TO]
BIDHU BHUSAN CHANDRA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2009-3-133] [REFERRED TO]
SURTHI DEVI VS. CENTRAL COAL FIELD LIMITED [LAWS(JHAR)-2019-4-142] [REFERRED TO]
SURTHI DEVI VS. CENTRAL COAL FIELD LIMITED [LAWS(JHAR)-2019-4-142] [REFERRED TO]
SOUTH CITY PROJECTS (KOLKATA) LTD. VS. IDEAL REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. [LAWS(CAL)-2021-4-44] [REFERRED TO]
SOUTH CITY PROJECTS (KOLKATA) LTD. VS. IDEAL REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. [LAWS(CAL)-2021-4-44] [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSAL CONSORTIUM OF ENGINEERS (P) LTD AND ANR VS. SANU CONSTRUCTION AND ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-68] [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSAL CONSORTIUM OF ENGINEERS (P) LTD AND ANR VS. SANU CONSTRUCTION AND ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-68] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY LAXMI SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-57] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY LAXMI SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-57] [REFERRED TO]
AKHILESH KUMAR KARDHAM VS. ZILA BASIC SIKSHA ADHIKARI J P NAGAR [LAWS(ALL)-2009-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
AKHILESH KUMAR KARDHAM VS. ZILA BASIC SIKSHA ADHIKARI J P NAGAR [LAWS(ALL)-2009-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ADDITIONAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION SHEERA NIYANTARAK [LAWS(ALL)-2005-2-109] [REFERRED TO]
TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ADDITIONAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION SHEERA NIYANTARAK [LAWS(ALL)-2005-2-109] [REFERRED TO]
ESTATE OFFICER VS. CHARANJIT KAUR [LAWS(SC)-2021-9-20] [REFERRED TO]
ESTATE OFFICER VS. CHARANJIT KAUR [LAWS(SC)-2021-9-20] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD VS. HARSOLIA MOTORS [LAWS(SC)-2023-4-43] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD VS. HARSOLIA MOTORS [LAWS(SC)-2023-4-43] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD VS. MB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2024-1-22] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD VS. MB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2024-1-22] [REFERRED TO]
PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD VS. GOVINDAN RAGHAVAN [LAWS(SC)-2019-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD VS. GOVINDAN RAGHAVAN [LAWS(SC)-2019-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
WG. CDR. ARIFUR RAHMAN KHAN AND ALEYA SULTANA VS. DLF SOUTHERN HOMES PVT. LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BEGUR OMR HOMES PVT. LTD.) [LAWS(SC)-2020-8-28] [REFERRED TO]
WG. CDR. ARIFUR RAHMAN KHAN AND ALEYA SULTANA VS. DLF SOUTHERN HOMES PVT. LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BEGUR OMR HOMES PVT. LTD.) [LAWS(SC)-2020-8-28] [REFERRED TO]
HEMANTA KUMAR NAYAK VS. UTKAL REALTORS PVT.LTD [LAWS(ORI)-2020-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
HEMANTA KUMAR NAYAK VS. UTKAL REALTORS PVT.LTD [LAWS(ORI)-2020-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED VS. AFTAB SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2018-12-42] [REGERRED TO]
EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED VS. AFTAB SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2018-12-42] [REGERRED TO]
NESTLE INDIA LIMITED VS. THE FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-8-61] [REFERRED TO]
NESTLE INDIA LIMITED VS. THE FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-8-61] [REFERRED TO]
GALAXY PRESS PVT LTD VS. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [LAWS(PAT)-2015-5-162] [REFERRED]
GALAXY PRESS PVT LTD VS. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [LAWS(PAT)-2015-5-162] [REFERRED]
AKHIL BHARTIYA UPBHOKTA CONGRESS BHOPAL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2009-3-73] [REFERRED TO]
AKHIL BHARTIYA UPBHOKTA CONGRESS BHOPAL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2009-3-73] [REFERRED TO]
KAMINI MALHOTRA VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2002-4-54] [REFERRED TO]
KAMINI MALHOTRA VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2002-4-54] [REFERRED TO]
RAMRATAN MEHSRAM VS. STATE OF M P AND ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2001-3-98] [REFERRED]
RAMRATAN MEHSRAM VS. STATE OF M P AND ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2001-3-98] [REFERRED]
JOSEPH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KER)-1997-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
JOSEPH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KER)-1997-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
SUBIYA DEVI VS. L.I.C. AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2009-3-352] [REFERRED TO]
SUBIYA DEVI VS. L.I.C. AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2009-3-352] [REFERRED TO]
RAMI INDULAL CHATURDAS & 26 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 3 [LAWS(GJH)-2016-1-323] [REFERRED]
RAMI INDULAL CHATURDAS & 26 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 3 [LAWS(GJH)-2016-1-323] [REFERRED]
BOMI JAL MISTRY VS. JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER OF MUMBAI [LAWS(BOM)-2005-1-66] [REFERRED TO]
BOMI JAL MISTRY VS. JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER OF MUMBAI [LAWS(BOM)-2005-1-66] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER KUMAR MATHUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1994-4-52] [REFERRED]
RAVINDER KUMAR MATHUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1994-4-52] [REFERRED]
V P AGGARWAL VS. CHIEF ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH [LAWS(NCD)-2005-12-59] [RELIED ON]
V P AGGARWAL VS. CHIEF ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH [LAWS(NCD)-2005-12-59] [RELIED ON]
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS VS. INDER KRISHAN RAINA C/O ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-12-3] [REFERRED TO]
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS VS. INDER KRISHAN RAINA C/O ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-12-3] [REFERRED TO]
HARPAL KOUR VS. JET AIRWAY INDIA LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2007-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
HARPAL KOUR VS. JET AIRWAY INDIA LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2007-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH GOYAL VS. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-11] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH GOYAL VS. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-11] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES VS. TAMIL NADU CONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL TRICHY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-56] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES VS. TAMIL NADU CONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL TRICHY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-56] [REFERRED TO]
K K MIGLANI VS. ASSTT ENGINEER I-T SUB-DIVISION CPWD LODHI COLONY NEW DELHI [LAWS(NCD)-2007-3-30] [REFERRED TO]
K K MIGLANI VS. ASSTT ENGINEER I-T SUB-DIVISION CPWD LODHI COLONY NEW DELHI [LAWS(NCD)-2007-3-30] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. INDRA PRAKASH KATYAL [LAWS(NCD)-2007-7-67] [RELIED ON]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. INDRA PRAKASH KATYAL [LAWS(NCD)-2007-7-67] [RELIED ON]
R JAGAN VS. MOTOR VEHICLES MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(NCD)-2007-1-16] [RELIED ON]
R JAGAN VS. MOTOR VEHICLES MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(NCD)-2007-1-16] [RELIED ON]
UNION OF INDIA VS. N NETHRAVATHI [LAWS(NCD)-2012-4-16] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. N NETHRAVATHI [LAWS(NCD)-2012-4-16] [REFERRED TO]
TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ORS VS. GAUTAM BAHRI [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-97] [REFERRED TO]
TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ORS VS. GAUTAM BAHRI [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-97] [REFERRED TO]
HAREKRISHNA BISWAS VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-18] [REFERRED TO]
HAREKRISHNA BISWAS VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-18] [REFERRED TO]
SAMARTH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS PARIJAT APARTMENT VS. RAMESH RAMCHANDRA LOKHANDE RAMANANDNAGER [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-71] [REFERRED TO]
SAMARTH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS PARIJAT APARTMENT VS. RAMESH RAMCHANDRA LOKHANDE RAMANANDNAGER [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-71] [REFERRED TO]
SINDHU KAILASH GAWADE VS. GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTION [LAWS(NCD)-2013-4-142] [REFERRED TO]
SINDHU KAILASH GAWADE VS. GURUDATTA CONSTRUCTION [LAWS(NCD)-2013-4-142] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD FAIZAN IQBAL VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-39] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD FAIZAN IQBAL VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-39] [REFERRED TO]
VARUN SINGH VS. CHD DEVELOPERS [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-83] [REFERRED TO]
VARUN SINGH VS. CHD DEVELOPERS [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-83] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH JAIN VS. M/S. RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH JAIN VS. M/S. RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER VS. CHARANJIT KAUR W/O. SHRI BALWANT SINGH [LAWS(NCD)-2017-5-143] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER VS. CHARANJIT KAUR W/O. SHRI BALWANT SINGH [LAWS(NCD)-2017-5-143] [REFERRED TO]
NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD VS. HARIVITTHAL TIMAJI GHUGUSKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2016-8-83] [REFERRED]
NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD VS. HARIVITTHAL TIMAJI GHUGUSKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2016-8-83] [REFERRED]
COCHIN PORT TRUST & ANR. VS. M.B. SATPUTE & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-9-121] [REFERRED TO]
COCHIN PORT TRUST & ANR. VS. M.B. SATPUTE & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-9-121] [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR GULSHAN KUMAR (RETD.) VS. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(DLH)-2017-4-83] [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR GULSHAN KUMAR (RETD.) VS. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(DLH)-2017-4-83] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK GOKARAN VS. CHAIRMAN MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH CHARITABLE HOSPITAL TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2002-10-127] [REFERRED]
DEEPAK GOKARAN VS. CHAIRMAN MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH CHARITABLE HOSPITAL TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2002-10-127] [REFERRED]
CAPTAIN C P GUPTA VS. INDIAN AIRLINES PROVIDENT FUND TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2002-12-82] [FOLLOWED ON]
CAPTAIN C P GUPTA VS. INDIAN AIRLINES PROVIDENT FUND TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-2002-12-82] [FOLLOWED ON]
PRABHAKAR VYANKOBA AADONE VS. SUPERINTENDENT CIVIL COURT [LAWS(NCD)-2002-7-51] [RELIED ON]
PRABHAKAR VYANKOBA AADONE VS. SUPERINTENDENT CIVIL COURT [LAWS(NCD)-2002-7-51] [RELIED ON]
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA VS. MANSA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-71] [REFERRED]
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA VS. MANSA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-71] [REFERRED]
CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATION VS. JOHN DORAI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-12-124] [REFERRED TO]
CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATION VS. JOHN DORAI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-12-124] [REFERRED TO]
M/S ASHOKA BUILDSTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. VS. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-4-100] [REFERRED TO]
M/S ASHOKA BUILDSTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. VS. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-4-100] [REFERRED TO]
LALAN KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1994-5-18] [REFERRED]
LALAN KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-1994-5-18] [REFERRED]
MOHAN SINGH VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION [LAWS(NCD)-1999-5-209] [REFERRED]
MOHAN SINGH VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION [LAWS(NCD)-1999-5-209] [REFERRED]
K VISHNU VS. NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(APH)-2000-7-72] [REFERRED TO]
K VISHNU VS. NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION [LAWS(APH)-2000-7-72] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN,UTTARNACHAL (UTTARAKHAND) POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS. JANAM SINGH [LAWS(UTN)-2016-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN,UTTARNACHAL (UTTARAKHAND) POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS. JANAM SINGH [LAWS(UTN)-2016-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAIVI COMMISSIONERATE, MAHAVIR JAIN VIDHYALAY, JUHU LANE VS. KRISHNA CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES [LAWS(BOM)-2018-1-313] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAIVI COMMISSIONERATE, MAHAVIR JAIN VIDHYALAY, JUHU LANE VS. KRISHNA CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES [LAWS(BOM)-2018-1-313] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. PYARE LAL KOUL [LAWS(J&K)-1998-11-41] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS. PYARE LAL KOUL [LAWS(J&K)-1998-11-41] [REFERRED TO]
KAMINI MALHOTRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2002-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
KAMINI MALHOTRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2002-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. UMMER KOYA HAJI [LAWS(KER)-2006-8-61] [REFERRED TO]
THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. UMMER KOYA HAJI [LAWS(KER)-2006-8-61] [REFERRED TO]
XCELL AUTOMATION VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-120] [REFERRED TO]
XCELL AUTOMATION VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-120] [REFERRED TO]
SUMANLATA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2021-2-60] [REFERRED TO]
SUMANLATA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2021-2-60] [REFERRED TO]
S. NAMBI NARAYANAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2014-10-249] [REFERRED TO]
S. NAMBI NARAYANAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2014-10-249] [REFERRED TO]
MIRZA SANAULLA VS. DAVANAGERE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2010-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
MIRZA SANAULLA VS. DAVANAGERE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2010-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
VIBIN P VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2012-10-492] [REFERRED TO]
VIBIN P VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2012-10-492] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJENDRA SWAROOP SACHAN VS. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KANPUR DEHAT [LAWS(ALL)-2011-7-160] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJENDRA SWAROOP SACHAN VS. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KANPUR DEHAT [LAWS(ALL)-2011-7-160] [REFERRED TO]
LAXMI MOHAN SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-10-29] [REFERRED TO]
LAXMI MOHAN SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2010-10-29] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN RADHU VS. THE EMMAR MGF CONSTRUCTION [LAWS(DLH)-2016-12-163] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN RADHU VS. THE EMMAR MGF CONSTRUCTION [LAWS(DLH)-2016-12-163] [REFERRED TO]
M/S LUCKY SHOES STORE VS. SMT. SUSHMA SANKHYAN AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-5-220] [REFERRED TO]
M/S LUCKY SHOES STORE VS. SMT. SUSHMA SANKHYAN AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-5-220] [REFERRED TO]
M. HEMALATHA DEVI VS. B. UDAYASRI [LAWS(SC)-2023-10-103] [REFERRED TO]
M. HEMALATHA DEVI VS. B. UDAYASRI [LAWS(SC)-2023-10-103] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIT CHAUDHARY VS. VIPUL LTD [LAWS(SC)-2023-9-20] [REFERRED TO]
ROHIT CHAUDHARY VS. VIPUL LTD [LAWS(SC)-2023-9-20] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF A P VS. J K TRADERS OF RAMAKEISHNA 70 MM THEATRE [LAWS(APH)-2010-12-108] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF A P VS. J K TRADERS OF RAMAKEISHNA 70 MM THEATRE [LAWS(APH)-2010-12-108] [REFERRED TO]
V KISHAN RAO VS. NIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL [LAWS(SC)-2010-3-77] [REFERRED TO]
V KISHAN RAO VS. NIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL [LAWS(SC)-2010-3-77] [REFERRED TO]
BARAT FRITZ WERNER LIMITED VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(SC)-2001-2-117] [REFERRED TO]
BARAT FRITZ WERNER LIMITED VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(SC)-2001-2-117] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD VS. BISHAMBER DAYAL GOYAL [LAWS(SC)-2014-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD VS. BISHAMBER DAYAL GOYAL [LAWS(SC)-2014-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY THIRUMURUGAN CO OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY VS. M LALITHA DEAD [LAWS(SC)-2003-12-84] [REFERRED]
SECRETARY THIRUMURUGAN CO OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY VS. M LALITHA DEAD [LAWS(SC)-2003-12-84] [REFERRED]
SAHYADRI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED VS. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNA [LAWS(SC)-2003-2-58] [REFERRED]
SAHYADRI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED VS. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNA [LAWS(SC)-2003-2-58] [REFERRED]
BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2000-2-124] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2000-2-124] [REFERRED TO]
USHA MISHRA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2006-11-88] [REFERRED TO]
USHA MISHRA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2006-11-88] [REFERRED TO]
Sudha Gupta and Ors. VS. State of M.P.& Ors. [LAWS(MPH)-1998-11-57] [REFERRED TO]
Sudha Gupta and Ors. VS. State of M.P.& Ors. [LAWS(MPH)-1998-11-57] [REFERRED TO]
SUBASH SHARMA VS. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-1] [REFERRED TO]
SUBASH SHARMA VS. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-1] [REFERRED TO]
R RAJAMANI VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-11-193] [REFERRED TO]
R RAJAMANI VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-11-193] [REFERRED TO]
MOUMITA ROYCHOUDHURY VS. ABHIJIT CHATTARJEE [LAWS(ORI)-2013-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
MOUMITA ROYCHOUDHURY VS. ABHIJIT CHATTARJEE [LAWS(ORI)-2013-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
T ANGAYARKANNI VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MADURAI DISTRICT [LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-371] [REFERRED]
T ANGAYARKANNI VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MADURAI DISTRICT [LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-371] [REFERRED]
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. VIDYA CHETAL [LAWS(SC)-2019-9-45] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. VIDYA CHETAL [LAWS(SC)-2019-9-45] [REFERRED TO]
P P M THANGAIAH NADAR FIRM VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2006-9-121] [REFERRED TO]
P P M THANGAIAH NADAR FIRM VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2006-9-121] [REFERRED TO]
NIKHIL T PARIKH - SOLE PROPREITOR OF PARIKH & PARIKH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2014-5-49] [REFERRED TO]
NIKHIL T PARIKH - SOLE PROPREITOR OF PARIKH & PARIKH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2014-5-49] [REFERRED TO]
SHIVRAJ M GIRGLANI VS. TELEGRAPH TRAFFIC EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE [LAWS(APCDRC)-2010-11-1] [REFERRED TO]
SHIVRAJ M GIRGLANI VS. TELEGRAPH TRAFFIC EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE [LAWS(APCDRC)-2010-11-1] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEK DODA VS. ESTATE OFFICER, GMADA [LAWS(NCD)-2024-1-15] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEK DODA VS. ESTATE OFFICER, GMADA [LAWS(NCD)-2024-1-15] [REFERRED TO]
MALLELA MURALIDHAR VS. LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-11-64] [REFERRED TO]
MALLELA MURALIDHAR VS. LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-11-64] [REFERRED TO]
PRASAD SETH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-78] [REFERRED TO]
PRASAD SETH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-78] [REFERRED TO]
RAM DULARI VS. STATE OF U P & 5 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-8-143] [REFERRED TO]
RAM DULARI VS. STATE OF U P & 5 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-8-143] [REFERRED TO]
NEW MARK KNITWEARS VS. UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-52] [REFERRED TO]
AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH VS. ASHA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2023-7-27] [REFERRED TO]
AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH VS. ASHA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2023-7-27] [REFERRED TO]
NEW MARK KNITWEARS VS. UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-52] [REFERRED TO]
NAGESH MARUTI UTEKAR VS. SUNSTONE DEVELOPERS JOINT VENTURE [LAWS(NCD)-2022-5-19] [REFERRED TO]
NAGESH MARUTI UTEKAR VS. SUNSTONE DEVELOPERS JOINT VENTURE [LAWS(NCD)-2022-5-19] [REFERRED TO]
GUNAKARA GIRI ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE VS. SAMIAH INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2022-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
GUNAKARA GIRI ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE VS. SAMIAH INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2022-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
AZAD GAS SERVICES VS. PETER MASIH [LAWS(NCD)-2022-1-49] [REFERRED TO]
AZAD GAS SERVICES VS. PETER MASIH [LAWS(NCD)-2022-1-49] [REFERRED TO]
RABINDRA BHARATI UNIVERSITY DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION RABINDRA BHAVAN VS. JAYATI ROY CHOWDHURY D/O SISIR ROY CHOWDHURY; SANJIB BISWAS S/O SUDHIR BISWAS; PRIYANKA SAHA D/O SIBESWAR SAHA; MOUSUMI DAS D/O SUNIL DAS [LAWS(NCD)-2017-11-94] [REFERRED TO]
RABINDRA BHARATI UNIVERSITY DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION RABINDRA BHAVAN VS. JAYATI ROY CHOWDHURY D/O SISIR ROY CHOWDHURY; SANJIB BISWAS S/O SUDHIR BISWAS; PRIYANKA SAHA D/O SIBESWAR SAHA; MOUSUMI DAS D/O SUNIL DAS [LAWS(NCD)-2017-11-94] [REFERRED TO]
PASSPORT OFFICER VS. RICHA BHANDARI [LAWS(NCD)-2016-3-9] [REFERRED TO]
PASSPORT OFFICER VS. RICHA BHANDARI [LAWS(NCD)-2016-3-9] [REFERRED TO]
SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION AND HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. KUMAR SELVARAJ [LAWS(NCD)-2011-3-31] [REFERRED TO]
SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION AND HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. KUMAR SELVARAJ [LAWS(NCD)-2011-3-31] [REFERRED TO]
SHARDA D KAMBLE VS. SHANTI KUMAR CHIVADE [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-96] [REFERRED TO]
SHARDA D KAMBLE VS. SHANTI KUMAR CHIVADE [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-96] [REFERRED TO]
POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, CHANDIGARH VS. BIMLA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2009-2-39] [REFERRED TO]
POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, CHANDIGARH VS. BIMLA DEVI [LAWS(NCD)-2009-2-39] [REFERRED TO]
MADHYA PRADESH AUDYOGIK KENDRA VIKAS NIGAM VS. RAJ LOK HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE [LAWS(NCD)-2005-9-80] [RELIED ON]
MADHYA PRADESH AUDYOGIK KENDRA VIKAS NIGAM VS. RAJ LOK HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE [LAWS(NCD)-2005-9-80] [RELIED ON]
SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS VS. VODAPHONE ESSAR MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2008-5-86] [REFERRED]
SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS VS. VODAPHONE ESSAR MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2008-5-86] [REFERRED]
PDC MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. AXIS BANK LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-3] [REFERRED TO]
PDC MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. AXIS BANK LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-3] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA VS. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER [LAWS(NCD)-2015-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA VS. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER [LAWS(NCD)-2015-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VS. PRINCY ROY [LAWS(NCD)-2014-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VS. PRINCY ROY [LAWS(NCD)-2014-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
C S SUBRAMANIAN VS. KUMARASAMY [LAWS(MAD)-1994-2-20] [REFERRED TO]
C S SUBRAMANIAN VS. KUMARASAMY [LAWS(MAD)-1994-2-20] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-1994-12-61] [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF MADRAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-1994-12-61] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA SC/ST DEVELOPMENT LTD VS. CHANNABASAPPA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-1-33] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA SC/ST DEVELOPMENT LTD VS. CHANNABASAPPA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-1-33] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPRAKASH MENON VS. LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-36] [RELIED ON]
JAIPRAKASH MENON VS. LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-36] [RELIED ON]
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCEN VS. BRIJ BHUSHAN MITTAL [LAWS(NCD)-2006-3-2] [RELIED ON]
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCEN VS. BRIJ BHUSHAN MITTAL [LAWS(NCD)-2006-3-2] [RELIED ON]
RAM PARKASH PAHWA VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PARKASH PAHWA VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
CHIEF POST MASTER DELHI G P O VS. RAM AVTAR GUPTA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-6-4] [RELIED ON]
CHIEF POST MASTER DELHI G P O VS. RAM AVTAR GUPTA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-6-4] [RELIED ON]
JOINT SUB REGISTRAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE SHANMUGAPURAM PALANI 2 DINDIGUL DISTRICT VS. MARAGATHAM [LAWS(NCD)-2007-3-41] [REFERRED TO]
JOINT SUB REGISTRAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE SHANMUGAPURAM PALANI 2 DINDIGUL DISTRICT VS. MARAGATHAM [LAWS(NCD)-2007-3-41] [REFERRED TO]
A P SINGH VS. PARAMJIT KAUR [LAWS(NCD)-2007-11-58] [REFERRED TO]
A P SINGH VS. PARAMJIT KAUR [LAWS(NCD)-2007-11-58] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CITY UNION BANK LTD VS. R CHANDRAMOHAN [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-50] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CITY UNION BANK LTD VS. R CHANDRAMOHAN [LAWS(NCD)-2007-2-50] [REFERRED TO]
SHIKSHA VIHAR SEHKARI AVAAS SAMITI LTD VS. CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-8-93] [REFERRED TO]
SHIKSHA VIHAR SEHKARI AVAAS SAMITI LTD VS. CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2007-8-93] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. PRABHATI [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-33] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. PRABHATI [LAWS(NCD)-2009-5-33] [REFERRED TO]
VAISHALI ATMARAM SURYAWANSHI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2009-12-110] [REFERRED TO]
VAISHALI ATMARAM SURYAWANSHI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2009-12-110] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. SHAH ENTERPRISE [LAWS(GJH)-2014-8-200] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. SHAH ENTERPRISE [LAWS(GJH)-2014-8-200] [REFERRED TO]
SAROJ JITUBHAI SHAH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-18] [REFERRED TO]
SAROJ JITUBHAI SHAH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-18] [REFERRED TO]
JASHVANTKUMAR JAYANTILAL SANGHAVI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
JASHVANTKUMAR JAYANTILAL SANGHAVI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
VIDYA H KAKADE W/O HANUMANT KAKADE AND ORS VS. ARJUN M DALVI AND ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2012-8-123] [REFERRED TO]
VIDYA H KAKADE W/O HANUMANT KAKADE AND ORS VS. ARJUN M DALVI AND ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2012-8-123] [REFERRED TO]
VASANT SHANKAR TORASKAR VS. SHREEJI BUILDERS [LAWS(NCD)-2012-4-29] [REFERRED TO]
VASANT SHANKAR TORASKAR VS. SHREEJI BUILDERS [LAWS(NCD)-2012-4-29] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & 9 ORS VS. SUDHIR SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2015-11-147] [REFERRED]
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & 9 ORS VS. SUDHIR SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2015-11-147] [REFERRED]
N.L.P. ORGANICS PVT. LTD. VS. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIAN BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-32] [REFERRED TO]
N.L.P. ORGANICS PVT. LTD. VS. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIAN BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2014-7-32] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD GUPTA VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-29] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD GUPTA VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-29] [REFERRED TO]
K. MADHUSUDHAN RAO VS. LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTIONS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. (LHCPL) [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-46] [REFERRED TO]
K. MADHUSUDHAN RAO VS. LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTIONS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. (LHCPL) [LAWS(NCD)-2022-7-46] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN BATWARA AND ORS. VS. NAV JEEVAN HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-3-5] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN BATWARA AND ORS. VS. NAV JEEVAN HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-3-5] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR VS. ANIL RAJGARHIA & ANR ; RAKSHA TPA PVT LTD ; SARIKA A RAJGARHIA & ANR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-9-220] [REFERRED]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR VS. ANIL RAJGARHIA & ANR ; RAKSHA TPA PVT LTD ; SARIKA A RAJGARHIA & ANR [LAWS(NCD)-2015-9-220] [REFERRED]
LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKS VS. RS G INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE [LAWS(SC)-1995-4-82] [RELIED ON]
LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKS VS. RS G INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE [LAWS(SC)-1995-4-82] [RELIED ON]
PATHI VENKATA NARAYANA VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2024-1-70] [REFERRED TO]
PATHI VENKATA NARAYANA VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2024-1-70] [REFERRED TO]
KALLEM PENTA REDDY VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, SAROORNAGAR MANDAL, SAROORNAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT [LAWS(APH)-2012-8-138] [REFERRED TO]
KALLEM PENTA REDDY VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, SAROORNAGAR MANDAL, SAROORNAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT [LAWS(APH)-2012-8-138] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR SHIVHARE VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT [LAWS(SC)-2010-4-26] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR SHIVHARE VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT [LAWS(SC)-2010-4-26] [REFERRED TO]
H N SHANKARA SHASTRY VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULATURE KARNATAKA [LAWS(SC)-2004-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
H N SHANKARA SHASTRY VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULATURE KARNATAKA [LAWS(SC)-2004-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS [LAWS(SC)-2001-8-59] [REFERRED]
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS [LAWS(SC)-2001-8-59] [REFERRED]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. VIMAL GOENKA [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-2] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. VIMAL GOENKA [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-2] [REFERRED TO]
SANT PRASAD SETH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-635] [REFERRED TO]
SANT PRASAD SETH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-635] [REFERRED TO]
K K KALSI VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION U T [LAWS(P&H)-1995-7-68] [REFERRED TO]
K K KALSI VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION U T [LAWS(P&H)-1995-7-68] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED VS. RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA LIMITED [LAWS(DLH)-2014-1-211] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED VS. RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA LIMITED [LAWS(DLH)-2014-1-211] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
DUSHASAN JENA VS. STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2015-9-52] [REFERRED TO]
DUSHASAN JENA VS. STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2015-9-52] [REFERRED TO]
EAR ALI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-12-51] [REFERRED TO]
EAR ALI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-12-51] [REFERRED TO]
HOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2009-4-255] [REFERRED TO]
HOME SOLUTION RETAIL INDIA LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2009-4-255] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD JUNED ABDULHAMID SHAIKH VS. ANJUMAN E BAZM E RAFIK TRUST [LAWS(GJH)-2023-8-722] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD JUNED ABDULHAMID SHAIKH VS. ANJUMAN E BAZM E RAFIK TRUST [LAWS(GJH)-2023-8-722] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-2] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-2] [REFERRED TO]
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD SARDHANA MEERUT VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH [LAWS(ALL)-2000-10-41] [REFERRED TO]
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD SARDHANA MEERUT VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH [LAWS(ALL)-2000-10-41] [REFERRED TO]
GAURI SHANKAR KUMAR VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS [LAWS(PAT)-2019-4-146] [REFERRED TO]
GAURI SHANKAR KUMAR VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS [LAWS(PAT)-2019-4-146] [REFERRED TO]
SHITAL FIBRES LIMITED VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-48] [REFERRED TO]
SHITAL FIBRES LIMITED VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-48] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM DISTRICT TRIVANDRUM VS. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM TRIVANDRUM [LAWS(KER)-2000-4-8] [REFERRED]
GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM DISTRICT TRIVANDRUM VS. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM TRIVANDRUM [LAWS(KER)-2000-4-8] [REFERRED]
V VATHSAN VS. V U RAZACK [LAWS(KER)-2002-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
V VATHSAN VS. V U RAZACK [LAWS(KER)-2002-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
VISVA BHARATI VS. RAKHI DEBNATH [LAWS(CAL)-1995-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
VISVA BHARATI VS. RAKHI DEBNATH [LAWS(CAL)-1995-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co LTD VS. District Consumer Redressal Forum [LAWS(CAL)-1996-2-5] [REFERRED TO]
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co LTD VS. District Consumer Redressal Forum [LAWS(CAL)-1996-2-5] [REFERRED TO]
R P M THANGAIAH NADAR FIRM VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(KAR)-2006-9-91] [REFERRED]
R P M THANGAIAH NADAR FIRM VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(KAR)-2006-9-91] [REFERRED]
RATHEESH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2013-7-154] [REFERRED TO]
RATHEESH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2013-7-154] [REFERRED TO]
T S BAKSHI VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(NCD)-2001-5-152] [REFERRED]
T S BAKSHI VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(NCD)-2001-5-152] [REFERRED]
BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN VS. KUSUM KURCHANIYA [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-68] [REFERRED TO]
BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN VS. KUSUM KURCHANIYA [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-68] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. SATYA PRAKASH [LAWS(NCD)-2003-10-109] [REFERRED]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. SATYA PRAKASH [LAWS(NCD)-2003-10-109] [REFERRED]
T V SUNDERASON VS. STERLING HOLIDAY RESORTS INDIA LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2003-5-17] [DISCUSSED]
T V SUNDERASON VS. STERLING HOLIDAY RESORTS INDIA LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2003-5-17] [DISCUSSED]
MEENA MITTAL VS. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2019-4-220] [REFERRED TO]
MEENA MITTAL VS. INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2019-4-220] [REFERRED TO]
N V SUBRAMANYAM VS. U B AIR P LTD [LAWS(NCD)-1994-10-79] [REFERRED]
N V SUBRAMANYAM VS. U B AIR P LTD [LAWS(NCD)-1994-10-79] [REFERRED]
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MURARI LAL GOEL [LAWS(NCD)-1994-9-93] [REFERRED]
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MURARI LAL GOEL [LAWS(NCD)-1994-9-93] [REFERRED]
BUNGA DANIEL BABU VS. M/S SRI VASUDEVA CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS [LAWS(SC)-2016-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
BUNGA DANIEL BABU VS. M/S SRI VASUDEVA CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS [LAWS(SC)-2016-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
ALLAHABAD BANK AGRA BRANCH CHILLI EINT ROAD AGRA VS. BANKING OMBUDSMAN KANPUR [LAWS(ALL)-2012-8-177] [REFERRED TO]
ALLAHABAD BANK AGRA BRANCH CHILLI EINT ROAD AGRA VS. BANKING OMBUDSMAN KANPUR [LAWS(ALL)-2012-8-177] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PYARE GUPTA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-1-50] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PYARE GUPTA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-1-50] [REFERRED TO]
SREE SANKARA VIDYAPEETOM COLLEGE, SREESANKARAPURAM AND ORS. VS. AKHIL P.K. AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2019-11-526] [REFERRED TO]
SREE SANKARA VIDYAPEETOM COLLEGE, SREESANKARAPURAM AND ORS. VS. AKHIL P.K. AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2019-11-526] [REFERRED TO]
REGIONAL MANAGER VS. BASHIR AHMAD RANGREZ & BROTHERS [LAWS(J&K)-1999-5-25] [REFERRED TO]
REGIONAL MANAGER VS. BASHIR AHMAD RANGREZ & BROTHERS [LAWS(J&K)-1999-5-25] [REFERRED TO]
K N SHARMA VS. TOSHALI RESORTS INTERNATIONAL [LAWS(SC)-2003-1-43] [REFERRED TO]
K N SHARMA VS. TOSHALI RESORTS INTERNATIONAL [LAWS(SC)-2003-1-43] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. VISHWABARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY [LAWS(SC)-2003-1-80] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. VISHWABARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY [LAWS(SC)-2003-1-80] [REFERRED TO]
FAQIR CHAND GULATI VS. UPPAL AGENCIES PVT LTD [LAWS(SC)-2008-7-16] [REFERRED TO]
FAQIR CHAND GULATI VS. UPPAL AGENCIES PVT LTD [LAWS(SC)-2008-7-16] [REFERRED TO]
NIVEDITA SHARMA VS. CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSN OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
NIVEDITA SHARMA VS. CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSN OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
DEV RAJ VS. SHRI KRISHAN LAL AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-6-51] [REFERRED TO]
DEV RAJ VS. SHRI KRISHAN LAL AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-6-51] [REFERRED TO]
SPR & RG CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. VS. K.VENKATARAMANAN [LAWS(MAD)-2021-7-363] [REFERRED TO]
SPR & RG CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. VS. K.VENKATARAMANAN [LAWS(MAD)-2021-7-363] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. SANTISSIMA MARY KHARKONGOR, W/O F SYIEMLIEH [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-4] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD VS. SANTISSIMA MARY KHARKONGOR, W/O F SYIEMLIEH [LAWS(MEGHCDRC)-2014-6-4] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR SWAMI VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR SWAMI VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR SWAMI VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR SWAMI VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2021-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
KALLEM PENTA REDDY VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER [LAWS(APH)-2013-8-9] [REFERRED TO]
KALLEM PENTA REDDY VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER [LAWS(APH)-2013-8-9] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. PRAKASH MOHANDAS SAINANI [LAWS(APH)-2006-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. PRAKASH MOHANDAS SAINANI [LAWS(APH)-2006-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. PRAKASH MOHANDAS SAINANI [LAWS(APH)-2006-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. PRAKASH MOHANDAS SAINANI [LAWS(APH)-2006-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL RAJ AND ORS. VS. UNITECH LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-5-1] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL RAJ AND ORS. VS. UNITECH LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-5-1] [REFERRED TO]
SAJAL ROY BARMAN VS. PRANTOSH BANDOPADHYAY [LAWS(NCD)-2011-7-21] [REFERRED TO]
SAJAL ROY BARMAN VS. PRANTOSH BANDOPADHYAY [LAWS(NCD)-2011-7-21] [REFERRED TO]
JETLITE AIRLINES VS. INDER PRAKASH GUPTA [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
JETLITE AIRLINES VS. INDER PRAKASH GUPTA [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL CHANDRA BISWAS VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2008-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL CHANDRA BISWAS VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2008-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
RAJNISH RATI VS. SADHU RAM JINDAL [LAWS(NCD)-2004-9-201] [REFERRED]
RAJNISH RATI VS. SADHU RAM JINDAL [LAWS(NCD)-2004-9-201] [REFERRED]
PSEB VS. KULBIR SINGH [LAWS(NCD)-2005-1-3] [RELIED ON]
PSEB VS. KULBIR SINGH [LAWS(NCD)-2005-1-3] [RELIED ON]
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD VS. S K KAPOOR [LAWS(NCD)-2005-10-91] [REFFERD TO APPEARING ADVOCATES :<ADV>BIPIN KR.DWIVEDI,S.K.KAPUR,RAJIV SHARMA</ADV> DATE OF JUDGMENT ]
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD VS. S K KAPOOR [LAWS(NCD)-2005-10-91] [REFFERD TO APPEARING ADVOCATES :<ADV>BIPIN KR.DWIVEDI,S.K.KAPUR,RAJIV SHARMA</ADV> DATE OF JUDGMENT ]
SHRI HARMIT SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2005-11-56] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI HARMIT SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2005-11-56] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHWARAN VS. SUJIT KUMAR BANERJEE [LAWS(NCD)-2005-7-68] [RELIED ON]
RAMESHWARAN VS. SUJIT KUMAR BANERJEE [LAWS(NCD)-2005-7-68] [RELIED ON]
BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPN LTD VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-87] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPN LTD VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-87] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD AYUB VS. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-28] [RELIED ON]
MOHD AYUB VS. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-28] [RELIED ON]
URBAN ESTATE PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ESTATE OFFICER VS. MOHINDER SINGH BAINS [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-108] [REFERRED TO]
URBAN ESTATE PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ESTATE OFFICER VS. MOHINDER SINGH BAINS [LAWS(NCD)-2006-2-108] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI JAL BOARD VS. NIRANJAN SHAH [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI JAL BOARD VS. NIRANJAN SHAH [LAWS(NCD)-2008-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA MOHAN NAMDEV VS. NAIB TEHSILDAR [LAWS(NCD)-2008-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA MOHAN NAMDEV VS. NAIB TEHSILDAR [LAWS(NCD)-2008-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
AWAZ AHMEDABAD VS. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA MUMBAI [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-32] [REFERRED TO]
AWAZ AHMEDABAD VS. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA MUMBAI [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-32] [REFERRED TO]
CMD BANK OF BARODA VS. GEORGE JOHN [LAWS(NCD)-2008-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
CMD BANK OF BARODA VS. GEORGE JOHN [LAWS(NCD)-2008-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
I P SHANKARAN VS. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE C B I [LAWS(BOM)-1999-3-89] [REFERRED TO]
I P SHANKARAN VS. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE C B I [LAWS(BOM)-1999-3-89] [REFERRED TO]
B L WADHERA VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2003-5-101] [REFERRED]
B L WADHERA VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2003-5-101] [REFERRED]
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD VS. CHANDAN MONDAL [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-32] [REFERRED TO]
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD VS. CHANDAN MONDAL [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-32] [REFERRED TO]
MANDOVI MOTORS PVT. LTD VS. PRAVENCHANDRA SHETTY [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-34] [REFERRED TO]
MANDOVI MOTORS PVT. LTD VS. PRAVENCHANDRA SHETTY [LAWS(NCD)-2013-9-34] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. ADOBE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-36] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. ADOBE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED VS. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-36] [REFERRED TO]
VIKAS MALHOTRA VS. RAMPRASTHA ESTATES PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-12-47] [REFERRED TO]
VIKAS MALHOTRA VS. RAMPRASTHA ESTATES PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-12-47] [REFERRED TO]
KANAK BALA MONDAL VS. ANJALI KARMAKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2023-3-74] [REFERRED TO]
KANAK BALA MONDAL VS. ANJALI KARMAKAR [LAWS(NCD)-2023-3-74] [REFERRED TO]
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. NOIDA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-1-29] [REFERRED TO]
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. NOIDA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-1-29] [REFERRED TO]
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JODHPUR VS. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JODHPUR VS. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
PUTTAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-11-34] [REFERRED TO]
PUTTAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-11-34] [REFERRED TO]
SHIV KUMAR VERMA VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2021-6-37] [REFERRED TO]
SHIV KUMAR VERMA VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2021-6-37] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITHA VENKATRAM AND ORS. VS. DIVYA RAYAPATI [LAWS(MAD)-2015-3-446] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITHA VENKATRAM AND ORS. VS. DIVYA RAYAPATI [LAWS(MAD)-2015-3-446] [REFERRED TO]
AMBA PARSHAD VS. H P NAGAR VIKAS PRADHIKARAN [LAWS(HPH)-1996-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
AMBA PARSHAD VS. H P NAGAR VIKAS PRADHIKARAN [LAWS(HPH)-1996-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT.LTD VS. CHARANJEET SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2021-7-22] [REFERRED TO]
AMAZON.COM NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC VS. FUTURE RETAIL LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2021-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
AMAZON.COM NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC VS. FUTURE RETAIL LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2021-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT.LTD VS. CHARANJEET SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2021-7-22] [REFERRED TO]
S P GOEL VS. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS DELHI [LAWS(SC)-1995-12-67] [DISTINGUISHED]
S P GOEL VS. COLLECTOR OF STAMPS DELHI [LAWS(SC)-1995-12-67] [DISTINGUISHED]
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER VS. SHIV KUMAR JOSHI [LAWS(SC)-1999-12-162] [REFERRED]
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER VS. SHIV KUMAR JOSHI [LAWS(SC)-1999-12-162] [REFERRED]
AJAY KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-11-80] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-11-80] [REFERRED TO]
K V JOSEPH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1997-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
K V JOSEPH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1997-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. JAIMALA [LAWS(ALL)-1996-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. JAIMALA [LAWS(ALL)-1996-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
RAM SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2000-8-142] [REFERRED TO]
RAM SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2000-8-142] [REFERRED TO]
SANDEEP BULK CARRIERS VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-73] [REFERRED TO]
SANDEEP BULK CARRIERS VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-73] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR OFFSET PRINTERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2018-2-282] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR OFFSET PRINTERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2018-2-282] [REFERRED TO]
K K PATHAK @ KESHAV KUMAR PATHAK VS. RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD [LAWS(PAT)-2019-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
K K PATHAK @ KESHAV KUMAR PATHAK VS. RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD [LAWS(PAT)-2019-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
DHANANJAY SETH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(PAT)-2023-5-41] [REFERRED TO]
DHANANJAY SETH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(PAT)-2023-5-41] [REFERRED TO]
AMRIK SINGH JOGINDER SINGH RICE MILLS OWNERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2004-5-9] [REFERRED TO]
AMRIK SINGH JOGINDER SINGH RICE MILLS OWNERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2004-5-9] [REFERRED TO]
OVERSEAS ENTERPRISES AND ORS. VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-11-56] [REFERRED TO]
OVERSEAS ENTERPRISES AND ORS. VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-11-56] [REFERRED TO]
LPG VITRAK ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(PAT)-2019-9-26] [REFERRED TO]
LPG VITRAK ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(PAT)-2019-9-26] [REFERRED TO]
S P MITTAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-3-160] [REFERRED TO]
S P MITTAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-3-160] [REFERRED TO]
RAM MILAN YADAV VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-1-153] [REFERRED TO]
RAM MILAN YADAV VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-1-153] [REFERRED TO]
GAJANANA MOTOR TRANSPORT CO LTD VS. K S T A TRIBUNAL [LAWS(KAR)-2003-3-58] [REFERRED TO]
GAJANANA MOTOR TRANSPORT CO LTD VS. K S T A TRIBUNAL [LAWS(KAR)-2003-3-58] [REFERRED TO]
ALBERT MOHANRAJ VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT [LAWS(KAR)-2009-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
ALBERT MOHANRAJ VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT [LAWS(KAR)-2009-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
WHATMAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS. P MEHTA [LAWS(DLH)-2019-2-420] [REFERRED TO]
WHATMAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS. P MEHTA [LAWS(DLH)-2019-2-420] [REFERRED TO]
ENGINEERS INDIA LTD VS. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2000-11-50] [REFERRED TO]
ENGINEERS INDIA LTD VS. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-2000-11-50] [REFERRED TO]
VIVA HIGHWAYS LTD. VS. MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(MPH)-2017-5-69] [REFERRED TO]
VIVA HIGHWAYS LTD. VS. MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(MPH)-2017-5-69] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI SAURABH BHARGAVA, S/O SHRI SHASHANK BHARGAVA VS. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION, KRISHI BHAWAN [LAWS(COCI)-2012-8-2] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI SAURABH BHARGAVA, S/O SHRI SHASHANK BHARGAVA VS. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION, KRISHI BHAWAN [LAWS(COCI)-2012-8-2] [REFERRED TO]
PRUDENTIAL CAPITAL MARKETS LTD VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2000-8-51] [REFERRED TO]
PRUDENTIAL CAPITAL MARKETS LTD VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2000-8-51] [REFERRED TO]
SURYA AIR PRODUCTS (P) LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2013-1-278] [REFERRED TO]
SURYA AIR PRODUCTS (P) LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2013-1-278] [REFERRED TO]
SAROJ AGARWAL VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2020-3-110] [REFERRED TO]
SAROJ AGARWAL VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2020-3-110] [REFERRED TO]
WOODS BIRCH HAZEL RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BENGAL UNITED CREDIT, BELANI HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-2019-4-75] [REFERRED TO]
WOODS BIRCH HAZEL RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BENGAL UNITED CREDIT, BELANI HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-2019-4-75] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD MUSTAFA VS. UP ZILADHIKARI PHOOLPUR AZAMGARH [LAWS(ALL)-2007-7-182] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD MUSTAFA VS. UP ZILADHIKARI PHOOLPUR AZAMGARH [LAWS(ALL)-2007-7-182] [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUMAR VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-8-163] [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUMAR VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-8-163] [REFERRED TO]
SANT LAL VS. THE CHIEF AUDIT OFFICER AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-5-174] [REFERRED TO]
SANT LAL VS. THE CHIEF AUDIT OFFICER AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-5-174] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. RAJ DULHARI [LAWS(P&H)-1998-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. RAJ DULHARI [LAWS(P&H)-1998-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATION VS. UNITED LABOUR UNION [LAWS(SC)-1996-12-80] [CONSIDERED]
AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATION VS. UNITED LABOUR UNION [LAWS(SC)-1996-12-80] [CONSIDERED]
SOMNATH PAUL VS. URBAN LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-2-10] [REFERRED TO]
SOMNATH PAUL VS. URBAN LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2024-2-10] [REFERRED TO]
ANANT RAJ LIMITED VS. HAPPY YADAV [LAWS(NCD)-2024-5-41] [REFERRED TO]
ANANT RAJ LIMITED VS. HAPPY YADAV [LAWS(NCD)-2024-5-41] [REFERRED TO]
THE JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR NO. II AND ORS. VS. ANNA MATHA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE [LAWS(MAD)-2015-3-283] [REFERRED TO]
THE JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR NO. II AND ORS. VS. ANNA MATHA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE [LAWS(MAD)-2015-3-283] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-1-49] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-1-49] [REFERRED TO]
THE PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF U.P. LTD. VS. PACQUIK INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-1-241] [REFERRED TO]
THE PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF U.P. LTD. VS. PACQUIK INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-1-241] [REFERRED TO]
SANNAM BHARTI VS. DTC [LAWS(DLH)-2013-8-255] [REFERRED TO]
SANNAM BHARTI VS. DTC [LAWS(DLH)-2013-8-255] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDERKANT GUPTA VS. M P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2010-4-29] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDERKANT GUPTA VS. M P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2010-4-29] [REFERRED TO]
N. SUNDARI VS. SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES [LAWS(TNCDRC)-2009-11-9] [REFRRED TO]
N. SUNDARI VS. SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES [LAWS(TNCDRC)-2009-11-9] [REFRRED TO]
INDOPOL FLOUR MILLS VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-5-137] [REFERRED TO]
INDOPOL FLOUR MILLS VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-5-137] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.HOME [LAWS(ALL)-2011-5-299] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.HOME [LAWS(ALL)-2011-5-299] [REFERRED TO]
PRATIMA BHARDWAJ VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-2-82] [REFERRED TO]
PRATIMA BHARDWAJ VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-2-82] [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN RAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-5-128] [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN RAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-5-128] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA PANDIT VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-9-142] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA PANDIT VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2012-9-142] [REFERRED TO]
MADHURI DEVI AND ORS VS. BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD [LAWS(PAT)-2007-1-156] [REFERRED]
MADHURI DEVI AND ORS VS. BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD [LAWS(PAT)-2007-1-156] [REFERRED]
U T CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION VS. AMARJEET SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2009-3-135] [REFERRED TO]
U T CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION VS. AMARJEET SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2009-3-135] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD VS. SURESH PRASAD SINHA [LAWS(SC)-2009-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD VS. SURESH PRASAD SINHA [LAWS(SC)-2009-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL SETHI VS. PRESIDENT CONSUMERS PROTECTION DISTRICT FORUM [LAWS(ALL)-1996-1-30] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL SETHI VS. PRESIDENT CONSUMERS PROTECTION DISTRICT FORUM [LAWS(ALL)-1996-1-30] [REFERRED TO]
RAM BAHADUR THAKUR PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2000-11-57] [REFERRED]
RAM BAHADUR THAKUR PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2000-11-57] [REFERRED]
INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION VS. VEERESH MALIK [LAWS(DLH)-2010-1-331] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION VS. VEERESH MALIK [LAWS(DLH)-2010-1-331] [REFERRED TO]
MAJ GEN V K VERMA VS. VIKRAM KUMAR [LAWS(HRCDRC)-2008-1-2] [REFERRED TO]
MAJ GEN V K VERMA VS. VIKRAM KUMAR [LAWS(HRCDRC)-2008-1-2] [REFERRED TO]
SUDHA GUPTA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-1998-11-27] [REFERRED TO]
SUDHA GUPTA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-1998-11-27] [REFERRED TO]
IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT LTD VS. ABHISHEK KHANNA [LAWS(SC)-2021-1-15] [REFERRED TO]
IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT LTD VS. ABHISHEK KHANNA [LAWS(SC)-2021-1-15] [REFERRED TO]
SAIPRIYA ESTATES VS. V V L SUJATHA [LAWS(APH)-2008-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
SAIPRIYA ESTATES VS. V V L SUJATHA [LAWS(APH)-2008-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2024-7-91] [REFERRED TO]
MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2024-7-91] [REFERRED TO]
AIR FRANCE THROUGH COUNTRY MANAGER VS. O P SRIVASTAVA MANAGING WORKER SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR SAHARA INDIA BHAWAN [LAWS(NCD)-2018-3-37] [REFERRED TO]
AIR FRANCE THROUGH COUNTRY MANAGER VS. O P SRIVASTAVA MANAGING WORKER SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR SAHARA INDIA BHAWAN [LAWS(NCD)-2018-3-37] [REFERRED TO]
AFTAB SINGH VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2017-7-20] [REFERRED TO]
AFTAB SINGH VS. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. [LAWS(NCD)-2017-7-20] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA RANI VS. M/S. CHD DEVELOPERS [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA RANI VS. M/S. CHD DEVELOPERS [LAWS(NCD)-2022-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
SANGEETA VINOD DESHANI VS. CCI PROJECTS PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-20] [REFERRED TO]
SANGEETA VINOD DESHANI VS. CCI PROJECTS PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-20] [REFERRED TO]
DEV ARORA VS. M/S. SWETA ESTATES PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-39] [REFERRED TO]
DEV ARORA VS. M/S. SWETA ESTATES PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2023-4-39] [REFERRED TO]
N. MANOHAR REDDY VS. HAPPY FARM AND RESORTS [LAWS(NCD)-2013-10-66] [REFERRED TO]
N. MANOHAR REDDY VS. HAPPY FARM AND RESORTS [LAWS(NCD)-2013-10-66] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS VS. HILL VIEW WELFARE ASSOCIATION [LAWS(NCD)-2012-8-51] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS VS. HILL VIEW WELFARE ASSOCIATION [LAWS(NCD)-2012-8-51] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTILAL TRIKAMBHAI BRAHAMBHATT VS. ABHINAV GOLD INTERNATIONAL MARKETING PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2012-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTILAL TRIKAMBHAI BRAHAMBHATT VS. ABHINAV GOLD INTERNATIONAL MARKETING PVT. LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2012-9-28] [REFERRED TO]
CHARAN HOMES PVT. LTD VS. JAI PRAKASH RAI [LAWS(NCD)-2012-11-37] [REFERRED TO]
CHARAN HOMES PVT. LTD VS. JAI PRAKASH RAI [LAWS(NCD)-2012-11-37] [REFERRED TO]
D K GANDHI VS. M MATHIAS [LAWS(NCD)-2007-8-83] [REFERRED TO]
MATIUR RAHAMAN VS. JAHANARA BEGUM [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-75] [REFERRED TO]
MATIUR RAHAMAN VS. JAHANARA BEGUM [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-75] [REFERRED TO]
HEAD POSTMASTER, PONNAI, KERALA & ORS. VS. V. AYYAPAN [LAWS(NCD)-2009-4-13] [REFERRED TO]
HEAD POSTMASTER, PONNAI, KERALA & ORS. VS. V. AYYAPAN [LAWS(NCD)-2009-4-13] [REFERRED TO]
GARHWAL JAL SANSTHAN VS. PURAN CHAND [LAWS(NCD)-2005-3-64] [REFERRED]
GARHWAL JAL SANSTHAN VS. PURAN CHAND [LAWS(NCD)-2005-3-64] [REFERRED]
D K GANDHI VS. M MATHIAS [LAWS(NCD)-2007-8-83] [REFERRED TO]
EXPRESS RESORTS AND HOTELS LTD VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2004-9-113] [FOLLOWED ON]
EXPRESS RESORTS AND HOTELS LTD VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2004-9-113] [FOLLOWED ON]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. S K SARAF [LAWS(NCD)-2005-1-7] [RELIED ON]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. S K SARAF [LAWS(NCD)-2005-1-7] [RELIED ON]
REKHA BHASIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1998-5-47] [CITED]
REKHA BHASIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1998-5-47] [CITED]
BANK OF BARODA AND ORS VS. SUKHBIR KAUR AND ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
BANK OF BARODA AND ORS VS. SUKHBIR KAUR AND ORS [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
ASHIANA INN LIMITED VS. PUNJAB & SIND BANK, IFB, BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
ASHIANA INN LIMITED VS. PUNJAB & SIND BANK, IFB, BANK [LAWS(NCD)-2013-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
DLF LIMITED VS. MRIDUL ESTATE (PVT.) LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2013-5-37] [REFERRED TO]
DLF LIMITED VS. MRIDUL ESTATE (PVT.) LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2013-5-37] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. CHAMAN LAL NARANG [LAWS(J&K)-1995-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD VS. CHAMAN LAL NARANG [LAWS(J&K)-1995-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA KUMAR GOYAL VS. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVLOPMENT BOARD [LAWS(KAR)-2009-1-18] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA KUMAR GOYAL VS. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVLOPMENT BOARD [LAWS(KAR)-2009-1-18] [REFERRED TO]
JANPAD PANCHAYAT DURG VS. TEJBHAN SADHWANI [LAWS(NCD)-2003-9-182] [REFERRED]
JANPAD PANCHAYAT DURG VS. TEJBHAN SADHWANI [LAWS(NCD)-2003-9-182] [REFERRED]
DELTA ASSOCIATES VS. LALSAB A NAIKODI [LAWS(NCD)-1995-5-72] [REFFERD TO APPEARING ADVOCATES :<ADV>MANOJ SVARUP,LALITA KOHLI,A.D.N.RAO,E.RODRIGUES</ADV> DATE OF J]
DELTA ASSOCIATES VS. LALSAB A NAIKODI [LAWS(NCD)-1995-5-72] [REFFERD TO APPEARING ADVOCATES :<ADV>MANOJ SVARUP,LALITA KOHLI,A.D.N.RAO,E.RODRIGUES</ADV> DATE OF J]
JATINDERDEV SINGH MUSAFIR VS. LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-1997-3-91] [REFERRED TO]
JATINDERDEV SINGH MUSAFIR VS. LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST [LAWS(NCD)-1997-3-91] [REFERRED TO]
SHARADCHANDRA RAOREKAR VS. BHOPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1998-4-54] [REFERRED]
SHARADCHANDRA RAOREKAR VS. BHOPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1998-4-54] [REFERRED]
Y YASODHAMMA VS. SUPDT OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE [LAWS(NCD)-2002-2-17] [REFFERD TO]
Y YASODHAMMA VS. SUPDT OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE [LAWS(NCD)-2002-2-17] [REFFERD TO]
BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN VS. KUSUM KURCHANIYA [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-67] [REFERRED TO]
BHOPAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN VS. KUSUM KURCHANIYA [LAWS(NCD)-2002-9-67] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARWALA CONSTRUCTIONS VS. SUNITA ASHOK VERMA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-8-291] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARWALA CONSTRUCTIONS VS. SUNITA ASHOK VERMA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-8-291] [REFERRED TO]
SRIPATHMANATHAN SRIHARAN EX-MANAGING VS. SARANG S KALE [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-273] [REFERRED TO]
SRIPATHMANATHAN SRIHARAN EX-MANAGING VS. SARANG S KALE [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-273] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KAUSHAL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2008-7-90] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KAUSHAL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2008-7-90] [REFERRED TO]
VRINDA GUJARATI VS. BAREILLY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(ALL)-1996-5-1] [REFERRED]
VRINDA GUJARATI VS. BAREILLY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(ALL)-1996-5-1] [REFERRED]
AWADH BIHARI PANDEY VS. CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER [LAWS(ALL)-1996-8-132] [REFERRED TO]
AWADH BIHARI PANDEY VS. CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER [LAWS(ALL)-1996-8-132] [REFERRED TO]
IN RE: SPECIAL REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 2012 VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2012-9-101] [REFERRED TO]
IN RE: SPECIAL REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 2012 VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2012-9-101] [REFERRED TO]
NARNE CONSTRUCTION P LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2012-5-25] [REFERRED TO]
NARNE CONSTRUCTION P LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2012-5-25] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGLU MANDAL VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2022-11-81] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGLU MANDAL VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2022-11-81] [REFERRED TO]
MAKIN PAPER MILLS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-112] [REFERRED TO]
MAKIN PAPER MILLS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2006-11-112] [REFERRED TO]
NARNE CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2010-8-39] [REFERRED TO]
NARNE CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2010-8-39] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. RAJEEV BANSAL [LAWS(SC)-2024-10-4] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. RAJEEV BANSAL [LAWS(SC)-2024-10-4] [REFERRED TO]
P THANGAM JESUDIAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2010-9-128] [REFERRED TO]
P THANGAM JESUDIAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2010-9-128] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD VS. AVTAR SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2010-9-99] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD VS. AVTAR SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2010-9-99] [REFERRED TO]
R D GOYAL VS. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2002-11-96] [REFERRED TO]
R D GOYAL VS. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2002-11-96] [REFERRED TO]
LIANHNUNI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2009-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
LIANHNUNI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2009-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-9-342] [REFERRED TO]
PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-9-342] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION VS. V P SHANTHA [LAWS(SC)-1995-11-156] [RELIED ON]
INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION VS. V P SHANTHA [LAWS(SC)-1995-11-156] [RELIED ON]
DUSHYANT KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-1-41] [REFERRED TO]
DUSHYANT KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2005-1-41] [REFERRED TO]
LOK ADHIKAR SANGH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2001-7-36] [REFERRED]
LOK ADHIKAR SANGH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2001-7-36] [REFERRED]
JAYALAKSHMI AMMAL VS. KALIAPERUMAL [LAWS(MAD)-2014-4-42] [REFERRED TO]
JAYALAKSHMI AMMAL VS. KALIAPERUMAL [LAWS(MAD)-2014-4-42] [REFERRED TO]
BECHU RAI GRAM SEWAK VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-3-228] [REFERRED TO]
BECHU RAI GRAM SEWAK VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-3-228] [REFERRED TO]
KIRLOSKAR FERROUS INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES ASSESSMENT I [LAWS(KAR)-1999-8-20] [REFERRED TO]
KIRLOSKAR FERROUS INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES ASSESSMENT I [LAWS(KAR)-1999-8-20] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KADEMANI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2004-10-8] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KADEMANI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2004-10-8] [REFERRED TO]
SIBY MATHEWS VS. S. NAMBI NARAYANAN AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
SIBY MATHEWS VS. S. NAMBI NARAYANAN AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
SUBAIDA ABDUL RASHEED AND ORS. VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-11-15] [REFERRED TO]
SUBAIDA ABDUL RASHEED AND ORS. VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-11-15] [REFERRED TO]
DARSHAN KUMAR GUPTA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2020-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
DARSHAN KUMAR GUPTA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2020-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
N. MANOHAR REDDY VS. HAPPY FARM AND RESORTS [LAWS(KARCDRC)-2013-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
N. MANOHAR REDDY VS. HAPPY FARM AND RESORTS [LAWS(KARCDRC)-2013-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
WEST BENGAL ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED VS. STATE COMMISSION [LAWS(CAL)-1999-11-7] [REFERRED TO]
WEST BENGAL ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED VS. STATE COMMISSION [LAWS(CAL)-1999-11-7] [REFERRED TO]
K.P. JAYA VS. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
K.P. JAYA VS. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-7-6] [REFERRED TO]
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. SARA BANGLA ELECTRICITY CONSUMER ASSOCIATION [LAWS(NCD)-1994-5-138] [REFERRED]
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. SARA BANGLA ELECTRICITY CONSUMER ASSOCIATION [LAWS(NCD)-1994-5-138] [REFERRED]
B N VENKATESH MURTHY VS. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1994-7-69] [REFERRED TO]
B N VENKATESH MURTHY VS. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(NCD)-1994-7-69] [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. GULZAR COLD STORAGE AND ICE FACTORY [LAWS(NCD)-1999-8-104] [REFERRED]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. GULZAR COLD STORAGE AND ICE FACTORY [LAWS(NCD)-1999-8-104] [REFERRED]
MODERN THREADS INDIA LTD VS. B K SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2000-1-77] [REFERRED]
MODERN THREADS INDIA LTD VS. B K SHARMA [LAWS(NCD)-2000-1-77] [REFERRED]
LT. COL. S.K. BHATIA (RETD.) VS. PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPN. & ANR. [LAWS(NCD)-2001-4-71] [REFERRED TO]
LT. COL. S.K. BHATIA (RETD.) VS. PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPN. & ANR. [LAWS(NCD)-2001-4-71] [REFERRED TO]
ANITA AHUJA VS. BANWARI LAL ARORA [LAWS(NCD)-2003-7-103] [REFFERD TO]
ANITA AHUJA VS. BANWARI LAL ARORA [LAWS(NCD)-2003-7-103] [REFFERD TO]
SUNIL BHATIA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2018-1-286] [REFERRED TO]
SUNIL BHATIA VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2018-1-286] [REFERRED TO]
RAMSAKHI VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2004-3-369] [REFERRED]
RAMSAKHI VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(NCD)-2004-3-369] [REFERRED]
BHUPENDRA SINGH VS. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2005-6-30] [RELIED ON]
BHUPENDRA SINGH VS. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2005-6-30] [RELIED ON]
PSEB VS. SATISH KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-17] [RELIED ON]
PSEB VS. SATISH KUMAR [LAWS(NCD)-2006-12-17] [RELIED ON]
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD VS. PREM KUMAR KAPOOR [LAWS(NCD)-2006-7-7] [REFERRED TO]
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD VS. PREM KUMAR KAPOOR [LAWS(NCD)-2006-7-7] [REFERRED TO]
B L SOOD VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION I P ESTATE NEW DELHI [LAWS(NCD)-2007-11-61] [REFERRED TO]
B L SOOD VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION I P ESTATE NEW DELHI [LAWS(NCD)-2007-11-61] [REFERRED TO]
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DIRECTOR VS. AYESHA BEGUM [LAWS(NCD)-2010-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DIRECTOR VS. AYESHA BEGUM [LAWS(NCD)-2010-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA VS. ESHWARAPPA [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-40] [REFERRED TO]
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA VS. ESHWARAPPA [LAWS(NCD)-2008-7-40] [REFERRED TO]
MITKARI V B VS. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2008-9-47] [REFERRED TO]
MITKARI V B VS. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD [LAWS(NCD)-2008-9-47] [REFERRED TO]
TULSIDAS P RAJPARA RETIRED OCTROI CLERK VS. DHORAJI NAGARPALIKA [LAWS(GJH)-2016-7-121] [REFERRED TO]
TULSIDAS P RAJPARA RETIRED OCTROI CLERK VS. DHORAJI NAGARPALIKA [LAWS(GJH)-2016-7-121] [REFERRED TO]
KANTA JAIN VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
KANTA JAIN VS. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
RETA AMBARDAR W/O K K AMBARDAR VS. NIRMAL PANDITA C/O BRIJ MOHAN [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-3-1] [REFERRED TO]
RETA AMBARDAR W/O K K AMBARDAR VS. NIRMAL PANDITA C/O BRIJ MOHAN [LAWS(J&KCDRC)-2010-3-1] [REFERRED TO]
I P SHANKARAN VS. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE C B I [LAWS(BOM)-1999-4-135] [REFERRED]
I P SHANKARAN VS. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE C B I [LAWS(BOM)-1999-4-135] [REFERRED]
SANGEETA BARRING VS. AIR INDIA LIMITED [LAWS(DLH)-2003-1-58] [REFERRED TO]
SANGEETA BARRING VS. AIR INDIA LIMITED [LAWS(DLH)-2003-1-58] [REFERRED TO]
SWO-INDIA LTD. VS. RAJ ASSOCIATES AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-7-24] [REFERRED TO]
SWO-INDIA LTD. VS. RAJ ASSOCIATES AND ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-7-24] [REFERRED TO]
SKY VIEW (HOME CABLE) VS. ORISSA CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-12-65] [REFERRED]
SKY VIEW (HOME CABLE) VS. ORISSA CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2015-12-65] [REFERRED]
EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND ORS. VS. AMIT PURI [LAWS(NCD)-2015-3-93] [REFERRED TO]
EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND ORS. VS. AMIT PURI [LAWS(NCD)-2015-3-93] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. CITY VIEW ENTERPRISES VS. HUDA & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-2-28] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. CITY VIEW ENTERPRISES VS. HUDA & ORS. [LAWS(NCD)-2016-2-28] [REFERRED TO]
CHARANJIT SINGH BAKHSHI H.S. BAKSHI PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT #599, SECTOR VS. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR [LAWS(NCD)-2016-1-108] [REFERRED]
CHARANJIT SINGH BAKHSHI H.S. BAKSHI PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT #599, SECTOR VS. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR [LAWS(NCD)-2016-1-108] [REFERRED]


JUDGEMENT

R. M. Sahai, J. - (1.)The question of law that arises for consideration in these appeals, directed against orders passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (referred hereinafter as National Commission), New Delhi is if the statutory authorities such as Lucknow Development Authority or Delhi Development Authority or Bangalore Development Authority constituted under State Acts to carry on planned development of the cities in the State are amenable to Consumer Protection Act 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for any act or omission relating to housing activity such as delay in delivery of possession of the houses to the allottees, non-completion of the flat within the stipulated time, or defective and faulty construction etc. Another aspect of this issue is if the housing activity' carried on by the statutory authority or private builder or contractor came within the purview of the Act only after its amendment by the Ordinance No. 24 in 1993 or the Commission could entertain a complaint for such violations even before.
(2.)How the dispute arose in different appeals is not of any consequence except for two appeals which shall be adverted later, for determining right and power of the Commission to award exemplary damages and accountability of the statutory authorities. We therefore come straightway to the legal issue involved in these appeals. But before doing so and examining the question of jurisdiction of the District Forum or State or National Commission to entertain a complaint under the Act, it appears appropriate to ascertain the purpose of the Act, the objective it seeks to achieve and the nature of social purpose it seeks to promote as it shall facilitate in comprehending the issue involved and assist in construing various provisions of the Act effectively. To begin, with the preamble of the Act, which can afford useful assistance to ascertain the legislative intention, it was enacted. 'to provide for the protection of the interest of consumers'. Use of the word 'protection' furnishes key to the minds of makers of the Act. Various definitions and provisions which elaborately attempt to achieve this objective have to be construed in this light without departing from the settled view that a preamble cannot control otherwise plain meaning of a provision. In fact the law meets long felt necessity of protecting the common man from such wrongs for which the remedy under ordinary law for various reasons has become illusory. Various legislations and regulations permitting the State to intervene and protect interest of the consumers have become a haven for unscrupulous ones as the enforcement machinery either does not move or it moves ineffectively, inefficiently and for reasons which are not necessary to be stated. The importance of the Act lies in promoting welfare of the society by enabling the consumer to participate directly in the market economy. It attempts to remove the helplessness of a consumer which he faces against powerful business, described as, 'a network of rackets' or a society in which, 'producers have secured power' to 'rob the rest' and the might of public bodies which are degenerating into store house of inaction where papers do not move from one desk to another as a matter of duty and responsibility but for extraneous consideration leaving the common man helpless, bewildered and shocked. The malady is becoming so rampant, widespread and deep that the society instead of bothering, complaining and fighting for it, is accepting it as part of life. The enactment in these unbelievable yet harsh realities appears to be a silver lining, which may in course of time succeed in checking the rot. A scrutiny of various definitions such as 'consumer', 'service', 'trader', 'unfair trade practice' indicates that legislature has attempted to widen the reach of the Act. Each of these definitions are in two parts, one, explanatory and the other expandatory. The explanatory or the main part itself uses expressions of wide amplitude indicating clearly its wide sweep then its ambit is widened to such things which otherwise would have been beyond its natural import. Manner of construing an inclusive clause and its widening effect has been explained in Dilworth v. Commissioner of Stamps, 1899 AC 99 as under:
" 'include' is very generally used (in) interpretation clauses in order to enlarge the meaning of the words or phrases occurring in the body of the statute, and when it is so used these words or phrases must be construed as comprehending, not only such things as they signify according to their natural, import, but also those things which the definition clause declares that they shall include".
It has been approved by this Court in Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. Highland Coffee Works of P. F. X. Saldanha and Sons, (1991) 3 SCC 617; C. I. T., Andhra Pradesh v. M/s. Taj Mahal Hotel, Secunderabad (1971) 3 SCC 550 and State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR 1960 SC 610. The provisions of the Act thus have to be construed in favour of the consumer to achieve the purpose of enactment as it is a social benefit oriented legislation. The primary duty of the Court while construing the provisions of such an Act is to adopt a constructive approach subject to that it should not do violence to the language of the provisions and is not contrary to attempted objective of the enactment.
(3.)Although the legislation is a milestone in history of socio-economic legislation and is directed towards achieving public benefit we shall first examine if on a plain reading of the provisions unaided by any external aid of interpretation it applies to building or construction activity carried on by the statutory authority or private builder or contractor and extends even to such bodies whose ancillary function is to allot a plot or construct a flat. In other words could the authorities constituted under the Act entertain a complaint by a consumer for any defect or deficiency in relation to construction activity against a private builder or statutory authority. That shall depend on ascertaining the jurisdiction of the Commission. How extensive it is A National or a State Commission under Ss. 21 and 16 and a consumer forum under S. 11 of the Act is entitled to entertain a complaint depending on valuation of goods or services and compensation claimed. The nature of, 'complaint' which can be filed, according to clause (c) of S. 2 of the Act is for unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice adopted by any trader or for the defects suffered for the goods bought or agreed to be bought and for deficiency in the service hired or availed of or agreed to be hired or availed of, by a 'complainant' who under clause (b) of the definition clause means a consumer or any voluntary consumer association registered under the Companies Act 1956 or under any law for the time being in force or the Central Government or any State Government or where there are one or more consumers having the same interest then a complaint by such consumers. The right thus to approach the Commission or the forum vests in consumer for unfair trade practice or defect in supply of goods or deficiency in service. The word 'consumer' is a comprehensive expression. It extends from a person who buys any commodity to consume either as eatable or otherwise from a shop, business house, corporation, store, fair price shop to use of private or public services. In Oxford Dictionary a consumer is defined as a, 'purchaser of goods or services'. In Black's Law Dictionary it is explained to mean, one who consumes. Individuals who purchase, use, maintain, and dispose of products and services. A member of that broad class of people who are affected by pricing policies, financing practices, quality of goods and services, credit reporting, debt collection, and other trade practices for which State and federal consumer protection laws are enacted.' The Act opts for no less wider definition. It reads as under:
" "Consumer" means any person who,-

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who (buy) such goods for consideration paid or promised or party paid or partly promised or under any system of deferred payment when such use is made with the approval of such person but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

(ii) hires or avails of any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who hires or avails of the service for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person:

[Explanation - For the purposes of sub-clause (i) "commercial purpose" does not include use by a consumer of goods bought and used by him exclusively for the purpose of earning his livelihood, by means of self-employment;]"
It is in two parts. The first deals with goods and the other with services. Both parts first declare the meaning of goods and services by use of wide expressions. Their ambit is further enlarged by use of inclusive clause. For instance, it is not only purchaser of goods or hirer of services but even those who use the goods or who are beneficiaries of services with approval of the person who purchased the goods or who hired services are included in it. The legislature has taken precaution not only to define 'complaint', 'complainant', 'consumer' but even to mention in detail what would amount to unfair trade practice by giving an elaborate definition in clause (r) and even to define 'defect' and 'deficiency' by clauses (f) and (g) for which a consumer can approach the Commission. The Act thus aims to protect the economic interest of a consumer as understood in commercial sense as a purchaser of goods and in the larger sense of user of services. The common characteristics of goods and services are that they are supplied at a price to cover the costs and generate profit or income for the seller of goods or provider of services. But the defect in one and deficiency in other may have to be removed and compensated differently. The former is, normally, capable of being replaced and repaired whereas the other may be required to be compensated by award of the just equivalent of the value or damages for loss. 'Goods' have been defined by Clause (i) and have been assigned the same meaning as in Sale of Goods Act, 1930 which reads as under:
'" "goods" means every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale".
It was therefore urged that the applicability of the Act having been confined to moveable goods only a complaint filed for any defect in relation to immovable goods such as a house or building or allotment of site could not have been entertained by the Commission. The submission does not appear to be well founded. The respondents were aggrieved either by delay in delivery of possession of house or use of sub-standard material etc. and therefore they claimed deficiency in service rendered by the appellants. Whether they were justified in their complaint and if such act or omission could be held to be denial of service in the Act shall be examined presently, but the jurisdiction of the Commission could not be ousted because even though it was service it related to immoveable property.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.