GAMBHIRSINH R. DEKARE Vs. FALGUNBHAI CHIMANBHAI PATEL
LAWS(SC)-2013-3-11
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: GUJARAT)
Decided on March 11,2013

Gambhirsinh R.Dekare Appellant
VERSUS
Falgunbhai Chimanbhai Patel Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

K M MATHEW VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
K M MATHEW VS. K A ABRAHAM [REFERRED TO]
ADALAT PRASAD VS. ROOPLAL JINDAL [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

ROHINI SINGH D/O LATE MR. M.B. SINGH & 6 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 [LAWS(GJH)-2018-1-435] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA KANT UPADHYA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2017-7-122] [REFERRED TO]
GOOGLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. VISAKHA INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER [LAWS(SC)-2019-12-36] [REFERRED TO]
SWAPAN KR. PAUL VS. ANAL ROY CHOWDHURY [LAWS(TRIP)-2021-6-18] [REFERRED TO]
AMAN KUMAR SINGH AND ANR VS. TIKENDRA THAKUR AND OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2014-9-49] [REFERRED]
SUDHA VERMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2013-8-43] [REFERRED TO]
N. JAYARAM AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP., BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANOTHER [LAWS(KAR)-2017-1-265] [REFERRED TO]
VITHAL VS. GUDUSAB [LAWS(KAR)-2019-6-482] [REFERRED TO]
RAJDEEP SARDESAI VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2014-7-8] [REFERRED TO]
JAIDEEP BOSE VS. M/S. BID AND HAMMER AUCTIONEERS PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2025-2-72] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. CNN-IBN7 VS. MAULANA MUMTAZ AHMED QUASMI [LAWS(HPH)-2017-8-19] [REFERRED TO]
M KESAVA MENON EDITOR, MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY, MATHRUBHOOMI PRINTING & PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD , KOZHIKODE VS. P. RAJU [LAWS(KER)-2020-9-461] [REFERRED TO]
PEVINDER KUMAR VS. MANOJ JOSHI [LAWS(HPH)-2023-8-6] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI KAMAL KUMAR GOENKA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR. [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-2-226] [REFERRED TO]
PRANESWAR BASUMATARY VS. ASOMIYA PRATIDIN AND 4 ORS [LAWS(GAU)-2018-9-7] [REFERRED TO]
BENNETT COLEMAN & CO. LTD. VS. K. SARAT CHANDRA [LAWS(APH)-2015-11-52] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The petitioner Gambhirsinh R. Dekare, at the relevant point of time was serving as Taluka Mamlatdar and an Executive Magistrate in Vadodara Taluka in the State of Gujarat. A Gujarati daily newspaper "Sandesh" is published from different places i.e., Surat, Valsad, Bharuch, Vadodara and other cities of India. Navinbhai Chauhan is the Resident Editor of Vadodara edition of "Sandesh" whereas Falgunbhai Chimanbhai Patel is the Editor of "Sandesh". The newspaper published a news item in its Vadodara issue dated 28.09.1999 that the petitioner "is in love and keeping illicit relations with the wife of a doctor at Ajwa Road with the following headlines:
"Mamlatdar Shri Gambhirsinh Dhakre is caught red handed by the youngstersMamlatdar is indulged in illicit relations with the wife of Doctor who is residing at Ajwa Road- attempts to conceal the matter- why the Government is not taking any action against the Mamlatdar -

(2.)According to the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as "the complainant"), the allegation published in the newspaper is false and defamatory. Accordingly, he filed complaint in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara. The complainant alleged that the news items are printed in the newspaper "as per the instructions and directions of the accused persons". In paragraph 3 of the complaint the complainant alleged as under:
"3. The Accused No. 1 and 2 of this case have deliberately published the news in the Page No. 12 of their daily newspaper 'Sandesh' dated 28/9/99 which is quite defaming and offending to us. The accused persons were in the knowledge that we the complainant shall be defamed in the Society due to publishing of such news and with a view to vilify us as the person having bad character, the accused persons, in collusion with each other, have published the following news in the newspaper deliberately."

(3.)The complainant termed those allegations to be false and stated that the Editor and the Resident Editor have tried to prove him a characterless person in the society and because of that he had faced shameful and disgraceful situation amongst the family members and friends. The news item further brought him in disrepute in the Department and the public. It has been alleged that the accused persons have published the news item without any evidence or proof. The complainant denied to have any illicit relation with the doctor's wife. The complainant was examined on solemn affirmation in which he reiterated the allegation.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.