LAWS(SC)-1992-2-36

M V ELISABETH M V ELISABETH Vs. HARWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED HANOEKAR HOUSE SWATONTAPETH VASCO DE GAMA GOA: HARWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO

Decided On February 26, 1992
M.V.ELISABETH Appellant
V/S
HARWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED,HANOEKAR HOUSE,SWATONTAPETH,VASCO DE GAMA,GOA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We grant leave in SLP(C) No. 10542 of 1985 which arises from the order of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court affirming the finding of the learned single Judge that the respondent's suit against the appellants was maintainable and that the High Court was competent to try the same in exercise of its admiralty jurisdiction. The Transferred Case No. 27 of 1987 the appeal filed by defendants 1 and 2 against the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court decreeing the suit. The case stood transferred to this Court pursuant to this Court's order dated 25-11-1986.

(2.) By our Order dated August 28,1991 we allowed Civil Appeal No. 3392 of 1991 filed by the 3rd defendant against the order of the High Court dismissing its petition for condonation of delay in presenting O.S.A.S.R. No. 39789 of 1988 in the High Court. We held that the appeal filed by the 3rd defendant had to be heard on the merits particularly on the question of law regarding the liability of the agent.

(3.) We shall now deal with the appeal arising from SLP(C) No. 10542 of 1985 where the only question is whether the learned Judges of the High Court have rightly held that the respondent's suit was maintainable in respect of a cause of action alleged to have arisen on or after 1-2-1984 when the vessel, M. V. Elisabeth, was lying in the Port of Marmagao; on 8-2-1984 when the vessel left the Port without issuing bills of lading or other documents for the goods shipped as required by the plaintiff-shipper; and, subsequently when the goods were discharged and handed over to the consignee at the port of destination at Ras-Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates during the period from 13-2-84 to 19-2-84, notwithstanding the direction of the plaintiff not to deliver the goods by reason of the buyer's failure to pay the agreed price. The 1st defendant, M. V. Elisabeth, is a vessel of foreign nationality and it is owned by the 2nd defendant which is a foreign company carrying on business in Greece, and the 3rd defendant is stated to be the local agent of the 2nd defendant at Goa.