JUDGEMENT
M. THANIKACHALAM J -
(1.) The insurance company/ opposite parties 1 and 2, aggrieved by the
order of the District Forum, has preferred this appeal.
(2.) The 1st respondent/ complainant/ claimant, is the owner of the vehicle
(Lorry), bearing Regn. No.ATA 6487. He insured the said vehicle, with the
appellants/ opposite parties on 4.3.1998, under policy
No.051601/31/021/11/04587/1997, and the period covered is between 27.3.98
to 26.3.99.
(3.) On 21.9.1998, the vehicle was running near Krishnagiri. On the way
from Rayapur to Namakkal, when the driver and the cleaner after taking
food, took rest, some unknown person committed highway robbery, they took
the vehicle also alongwith the driver and cleaner. On the way, committing
murder of the driver, they have thrown the lorry driver as well as the
cleaner, as if the cleaner also dead. Later, the matter was informed to
the owner, who rushed to the spot, but unable to locate the lorry.
Complaint to the police, as well as to the insurance company, failed to
yield restoration of the vehicle as well as compensation. Therefore, the
respondent as claimant, claiming a sum of Rs.2 lakhs under the policy,
with interest thereon, in addition to compensation of Rs.50000/-, has
filed a case.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.