JUDGEMENT
M. THANIKACHALAM -
(1.) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant.
(2.) The complainant / appellant who is having the savings Bank Account
with the opposite party, obtained loan from the opposite party,
surrendering the Fixed Deposit as security. Though, complainant was
paying loan amount regularly, later on, unable to pay the same, because
of the loss sustained in the agricultural operation. The bank without
giving any notice, adjusted the loan amount, from the fixed deposit
receipts, even before its maturity, which is illegal, even against
natural justice. Hence, the complaint is filed claiming refund of fixed
deposit amount as well as for compensation.
(3.) The opposite party denying the averments in the complaint inter alia
contended, that the complainant executed an agreement, obtained a loan
from the bank to the tune of Rs.1,24,000 /- on 28.04.1999, and in the
loan agreement, the complainant has authorised the bank to exercise
general power of lien, in favour of the bank, that when the complainant
has failed to discharge the loan as agreed, exercising authority
available under the loan agreement, adjusted fixed deposit receipts
amount towards the loan in which there cannot be any deficiency of
service or negligent and this being the position, the question of
returning the amount or to pay the compensation does not arise, there by
prayed for the dismissal of the complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.