AIR INDIA Vs. AMULU SELVANAYAGAM
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
N.KANNADASAN, J. -
(1.) The appellant is the 3rd opposite party, respondent 1 and 2 are the
complainants and the respondents 3 and 4 are the 1st and 2nd opposite
parties before the District Forum.
(2.) The complaint is filed before the District Forum on the ground that
the complainants have got a confirmed ticket, which was obtained through
the 1st opposite party. However, the 2nd complainant was not permitted to
travel from Singapore to India, and as such there was deficiency in
service. Initially the complaint was filed only as against opposite
parties 1 and 2 in the year 2001, and subsequent application was filed to
implead 3rd opposite party as one of the party and the said application
was ordered on 13.1.2003. The relief is claimed as against opposite
parties 1 and 3. The District Forum has allowed the complaint holding
that there is deficiency in service on the part of the 3rd opposite party
and accordingly granted relief as stated therein. Against the said order,
the present appeal is filed.
(3.) Appeal is filed raising various grounds as set out in the memorandum
of appeal. As regards 2nd opposite party is concerned learned counsel
would submit that even though no relief is claimed as against the 2nd
opposite party, they are unnecessarily dragged by impleading them as one
of the party.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.