K.INBASEKHAR, M.D.D.M Vs. M.SAMIYAN PILLAI
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
N. KANNADASAN, J. -
(1.) The appellant is the opposite party and respondent is the complainant
before the District Forum.
(2.) The complaint is represented by the learned counsel and there is no
representation for the respondent / opposite party. After notice is
ordered, the counsel for the appellant has taken private notice
indicating that the respondent shall appear on 11.11.2008. The said
notice was received by the authorized person of the complainant /
respondent on 26.10.2008. Thereafter the respondent / complainant has
sent telegram to the Registry that he is not in a position to travel and
prayed for an adjournment with a request to intimate the date of next
hearing. On the basis of the said telegram, the registry has sent a
notice, indicating the next hearing date as 26.11.2008. Even today, there
is no representation on behalf of the respondent / complainant.
(3.) In the light of the above, we propose to dispose of the appeal based
on the available records and the entire materials including the finding
of the District Forum.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.