K.VENKATACHALAM Vs. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PANCHAYAT UNION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
K.SAMPATH, J. -
(1.) The Appeal has been filed against the order of the District Forum,
Namakkal in C.O.P. No. 47 of 2003.
(2.) The grievance of the complainant was that the opposite parties
collected charges for reconnection without actually disconnecting the
water line. In fact, the collection of charges in a sum of Rs.110/- was
done on 03/01/2003, when there was no disconnection, the actual
disconnection having been effected only on 26/03/2003.
(3.) Be that at it may, it would appear that there are proceedings taken by
the complainant before the Honble High Court, Madras in W.P. No. 11622
of 2005 in which it was represented on behalf of the opposite parties
panchayat that because the complainant was in arrears in respect of Door
No. 7/58, the connection with regard to Door 7/70 was disconnected. There
was a direction given by the High Court to the effect that subject to the
complainant paying the arrears due for Door No. 7/58, he would get
reconnection in respect of Door No.7/70.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.