JUDGEMENT
N.KANNADASAN, J. -
(1.) The first and third opposite parties are the appellants and the first
respondent is the complainant and second respondent is the second
opposite party before the District Forum.
(2.) The complaint is filed before the District Forum alleging deficiency
in service on the part of the opposite parties with regard to the Mobile
Phones purchased by the complainant. The District Forum has allowed the
complaint and granted relief therein, as against which the present appeal
is file.
(3.) The short question that is raised before this Commission is that even
though the complainant is filed in his individual name by showing the
Cause Title to the effect that he is the Managing Director of K.S.O.P.
Traders, in reality, the complaint has to be construed as if it is filed
on behalf of the Firm. The Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted
that the complaint itself ought not have been entertained since the
complainant is not a consumer within the meaning of the Act. We have
perused the entire averments made in the complaint. The averment clearly
discloses that the complainant has purchased several Mobile Phones from
the opposite parties and all the Mobile Phones to be used by employees of
the Firm and the Firm is carrying on business pertaining to the usage of
the Mobile Phones. In as much as the averment itself is very clear to the
effect that the goods are purchased for commercial purpose, we are of the
opinion that the complainant cannot be termed as a consumer within the
meaning of Section 2 (1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The
Honble National Commission in its decision render in M/s.Harsolia
Motors Vs. M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd., & Ors reported in 2005
(1) CPR 1 (NC) has explained about the definition of Section 2 (1) (d)
and what is a commercial purpose Whether the services are availed for
any commercial purpose. In the light of the principles laid down and
as well as plain reading of the provision and averments made in the
complaint, we are of the opinion that the complaint is not maintainable.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.