SELVAKUMAR Vs. ADHILAKSHMI
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) The appellant is the 1st opposite party before the District Forum. 1st
Respondent is the complainant and the 2nd respondent is the 2nd opposite
party before the District Forum.
(2.) The complainant approached the District Forum seeking relief to the
effect that even though the Fixed Deposit amount, which is lying in the
hands of the 2nd opposite party, wherein it is indicated that the Fixed
Deposit is under the category former or survivor; and she being the
former, she was not paid the money. According to the complainant,
since the 2nd opposite party has failed to disburse the amount, she
alleged deficiency in service on the part of the 2nd opposite party and
approached the District Forum.
(3.) The complaint was resisted by the 1st opposite party to the effect
that a Civil Suit is pending on the file of the Munsiff Court, Panruti in
OS No.210/2002, and the order of injunction is in force, and unless the
Civil Court renders finding, the amount should not be disbursed.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.