MANAGER BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LIMITED Vs. U.DHANASEKARAN
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Manager Bajaj Auto Finance Limited
Click here to view full judgement.
K.SAMPATH, J. -
(1.) The appeal is against E.P.No.61/2005 in C.O.P. No.305/2002 on the file
of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Madurai.
(2.) In our view, no appeal is maintainable against execution proceedings.
The grievance of the appellant/opposite party/judgement debtor is that
the E.P. had been taken on file under Order XXI Rule 11 of C.P.C. and
that the E.P. has to be filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection
Act. Their further grievance is that the District Forum had straightaway
ordered arrest of the opposite party/judgement debtor without giving an
opportunity to contest the case. In our view, quoting of wrong section
can hardly be a ground for upsetting proceedings in execution. There is
nothing to show whether any appeal has been filed against the order in
the main complaint. The appeal is not maintainable.
(3.) In fine, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.