COMMISSIONER, SIVAKASI MUNICIPALITY, SIVAKASI Vs. P.I.T.THYYAGARAJAN, YOGAM, SIVAKASI
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Click here to view full judgement.
N.KANNADASAN, J. -
(1.) The appellant is the opposite party and the respondent is the
complainant before the District Forum.
(2.) The complainant has approached the District Forum by alleging
deficiency on the part of the opposite party to the effect that he was
made to run from pillar to post to get a copy of the survey extract. Even
though, the complainant has claimed a compensation of Rs.4 lakhs, a sum
of Rs.1000/- towards compensation and further sum of Rs.1000/- was
ordered as cost.
(3.) The learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no
deficiency on the part of the appellant/opposite party and the opposite
party has merely called upon the complainant to explain the reasons for
which copy of the extract is required and since the complainant has not
sent any reply, there was delay on the part of the complainant in
furnishing the copy of the extract. According to the learned counsel, the
District Forum has not considered the reasoning adduced by the
appellant/opposite party in this regard and accordingly prays to set
aside the order.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.