JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) This is a complaint under Section 12 and 13 of the Consumer Protection
Act, 1986, hereinafter called "Act", claiming a sum of Rs.15,43,853/-
based upon the policy for the loss caused in the fire accident with
interest, amounting to Rs.11,73,500/-, for a further sum of Rs.5 lakhs as
compensation for mental agony with costs on the following grounds [in
brief].
(2.) The complainant, who was engaged in the manufacturing of HDPE and PP
Woven fabrics and sacks, was owning a factory, wherein, he had stocked
the goods also, obtaining financial assistance from the 4th opposite
party. As insisted by the 4th opposite party, the complainant had taken a
Fire Policy-?C?, dated 07.12.1999, covering the period 31.12.1999 to
30.12.2000, by paying necessary premium, by the 4th opposite party.
(3.) There was a fire accident on 14.05.2000 at 01.30 hours in the factory
premises of the complainant, in which, the entire stock worth of
Rs.15,43,853/- was gutted, which was reported, not only to the Fire
Service, but also to the Insurance Company as well as the Bank. The
complainant, furnishing necessary informations and documentary evidence
to the second and third opposite parties- the Surveyors, not only sought
permission to resume business to avoid further loss and also claimed
damages. Unfortunately when the correspondences were pending, the second
opposite party unilaterally closed the file on 5.12.2000, thereby
committed deficiency.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.