JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The opposite party in CC.No.33/2005, on the file of District Forum,
Vellore, dissatisfied with the order, has come before us, challenging the
same, as appellant.
(2.) The complainant / respondent, entrusted his Mahindra Jeep, bearing
Regn. No.TN20 F9438, with the opposite party, for completing tinkering,
painting and all repairs, which was estimated for about Rs.35000/-,
giving an undertaking, that the vehicle will be delivered after repair,
within 15 days. Further the complainant has paid a sum of Rs.20000/- on
6.4.2005. The opposite party, as agreed after 15 days, when the
complainant approached, failed to deliver the vehicle, and after nearly
one month, demanded a sum of Rs.75000/-, which was paid by the
complainant, taking delivery of the vehicle.
(3.) The opposite party, charged the complainant excessively, and for some
items twice, totaling a sum of Rs.20000/-, which they are liable to
refund, with interest. The opposite parties did not complete the work to
the vehicle, though collected Rs.75000/-, and there were defects in the
painting, and other works, said to have been attended by the opposite
party, thereby committing deficiency in service, causing mental agony,
for which the complainant, is entitled to further sum of Rs.70000/- as
compensation, in addition to the expenses incurred to the tune of
Rs.20000/-. Thus alleging deficiency, dissatisfaction in the work carried
out by the opposite parties, the consumer complaint was filed, seeking
certain reliefs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.