JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The complainants are the appellants.
(2.) Facts necessary for the disposal of the case:-
Tmt.Nagarathinam, wife of the second complainant, mother of the first
complainant, consulted the opposite party on 02.02.2007 at 11.30 a.m.
since she had pain at the nap of neck. As prescribed, Tmt.Nagarathinam
took the medicines and after consumption, severe pain had occurred at the
nap of neck intolerably on the same day, which was reported over phone,
for which, she was advised to admit, admitted at St.Luke?s Hospital
immediately. On admission, the opposite party examined Tmt.Nagarathinam
and even given infra red light treatment, but there was no improvement at
all, pain has not subsidized and in fact, she became drowsy, gradually
disoriented, which was explained,, that Tmt.Nagarathinam would recover
soon and the symptoms are because of the medicines.
(3.) On 6.2.2007 at 6 a.m., when the first complainant reported to the
doctor about the disorientation of her mother, he suggested some tests to
be taken at N.M. Hospital, for which, the complainants are not agreeable
and discharged Tmt.Nagarathinam, in order to admit her in Ramakrishna
Hospital. The opposite party also gave a letter to Dr.K.R.Shetty, without
furnishing the case history. At 10.30 a.m. on the same day,
Tmt.Nagarathinam was admitted in the Ramakrishna Hospital, where it was
diagnosed that she was suffering from Carbuncle at the nap of neck and
due to the same, septicemia was caused, suggesting immediate operation on
the very next day. But despite treatment, due to late admission and late
diagnoses, respiratory depression formed and she died on 7.2.2007 at 1.25
a.m. due to cardio respiratory arrest secondary to septicemia and T2DM.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.